Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

YnetSports

Maccabi Tel Aviv Control Battle Escalates to Legal Arena

Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba

CenterCharged tone

Hebrew · 9 newsrooms covering

Richard Daiz is taking legal action, including seeking an injunction and arbitration, in his dispute with Shimon Mizrahi over control of the Maccabi Tel Aviv basketball club. The legal battle centers on share purchases and the right of first refusal, with Daiz challenging Mizrahi's actions and financial capacity.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Richard Daiz will seek an injunction and arbitration over Maccabi Tel Aviv club control.
  • Daiz disputes Shimon Mizrahi's share purchases and right of first refusal.
  • Arguments include bad faith and Mizrahi's financial capability.
  • Arbitration could last over six months, with an injunction freezing ownership.
  • Ownership would revert to pre-sale levels if the injunction is granted.

The fight for control of the Maccabi Tel Aviv basketball club has moved to the legal sphere, as Richard Daiz plans to file for an injunction and pursue arbitration. This follows Shimon Mizrahi's announcement that he will exercise his right of first refusal to purchase additional shares in the club. Daiz intends to present four main arguments in the upcoming arbitration proceedings. Firstly, he will contest Mizrahi's right to purchase 6.5% of shares intended for Levin, asserting his own right of first refusal. Secondly, Daiz will argue his right to exercise this option on an additional 7.5% of shares transferred from the Rekanati family to Levin. Thirdly, Daiz claims Mizrahi acted in bad faith, initially intending to sell shares to Levin but then deciding to buy more himself after Daiz exercised his right of first refusal, a move that would prevent Daiz from gaining controlling ownership. The fourth argument concerns Mizrahi's financial capability to complete the purchase, with Daiz demanding proof of the sources of funds Mizrahi intends to use. According to the shareholders' agreement, such disputes must be resolved through arbitration, a process that could take over six months. To prevent changes in ownership structure during this period, Daiz is seeking an immediate injunction to halt all transactions and freeze the current ownership status until the arbitrator rules. If granted, the share distribution would revert to the state after the Federman family's shares were acquired: the Rekanati family holding 58%, Shimon Mizrahi 14.5%, Daiz 17.5%, and Ben Ashkenazi 10%. In this scenario, neither the sales to Levin nor the exercise of the right of first refusal would be finalized pending the arbitration decision.

YnetCentre · Rishon LeZion

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

SportsTopic

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 11 outlets
First: Sport5 · Sep 5

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Open the Wire