French Jewish Council Accuses Macron of Downplaying Hamas's Role
Translated & summarized from i24NEWS French by baba
France's CRIF organization accused President Emmanuel Macron of downplaying Hamas's responsibility for the October 7 attacks and its presence in the West Bank. The CRIF stated Macron's remarks deny reality and harm France-Israel relations.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- CRIF criticizes Macron for ignoring Hamas's responsibility in the Gaza war.
- Macron's UN statement claimed Hamas never operated in the West Bank.
- CRIF cites Netanel Shukrun's murder as proof of Hamas's West Bank activity.
- The organization warns Macron's words aid radical anti-Zionist narratives.
- CRIF states France-Israel relations are at an all-time low.
The Representative Council of Jewish Institutions in France (CRIF) has strongly criticized French President Emmanuel Macron's recent remarks at the UN, where he stated that "Hamas has never operated in the West Bank." In a statement on X, the CRIF asserted that this claim "denies the reality of Hamas's presence and the numerous terrorist attacks it has carried out from cells established in that territory."
The organization cited the recent murder of Franco-Israeli father of six, Netanel Shukrun, who was killed in an attack on September 20 that Hamas praised, as evidence of this reality. The CRIF also suggested that the Palestinian Authority's postponement of legislative elections since 2006 is due to fear of Hamas winning, a fear stemming from the terrorist group's presence in the West Bank.
Beyond what it termed a "factual error," the CRIF also criticized Macron's broader discourse on the Gaza war, accusing him of placing "the entire responsibility for the situation in Gaza on Israel" while "silencing Hamas's absolute responsibility in the outbreak of this war on October 7." The CRIF warned that this omission grants a "symbolic victory to the narrative of the most radical anti-Zionist movements."
The CRIF acknowledged that political disagreements between France and Israel are legitimate but cautioned against further deterioration of their relationship. The organization concluded that "historical inaccuracies or virulent ostracizations unnecessarily contribute to degrading a relationship that is already at an all-time low."
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Left 1Centre 5Right 5Haredi 3Arab 1Other 6
