Israeli Parties Forge Alliances Ahead of Elections to Maximize Votes
Four Israeli parties opposing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu announced on Thursday, September 10, that they have signed agreements to pool remaining votes in the upcoming elections. Naftali Bennett of the Yamina party and Avigdor Lieberman of Yisrael Beiteinu were the first to report their agreement. Gadi Eisenkot, leader of the Telem party, who had initially preferred a different alliance, ultimately formed a pact with Yair Golan's Democratic Party. Eisenkot's party stated he played a significant role in organizing the "camp of change," enabling these internal agreements to prevent vote wastage, a lesson learned from past elections. They expressed satisfaction that every vote for change would now contribute to one of the allied parties, avoiding lost votes. Golan's party welcomed the agreement with Telem and the broader cooperation within the "camp of change," emphasizing their shared goal of replacing the "government of failure of October 7."
Meanwhile, Prime Minister Netanyahu faces a dilemma. His Likud party may need to sign a similar vote-sharing agreement with Ofir Winter's Amcha Israel party, which is polling near the electoral threshold. Internal disputes within Likud persist regarding how to handle this potential alliance. Bezalel Smotrich, leader of the Religious Zionism party, warned that right-wing voters supporting Eisenkot might inadvertently end up with Golan as a key minister in a future government, a scenario he claims is now officially confirmed.
The article also explains the mechanism of "residual vote agreements." These pre-election pacts allow two parties to cooperate in distributing leftover votes that fall short of securing an additional parliamentary seat (mandate). Instead of being lost, these votes are pooled, allowing the allied parties to be treated as a single list for the calculation of the final mandates. This process aims to maximize the number of seats won by the participating parties, ensuring that votes cast for them contribute more effectively to their representation in the Knesset.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.