Lithuanian Haredi Leadership Shakeup May Impact Netanyahu's Coalition
A dramatic decision to remove Moshe Gafni and Uri Maklev from the Degel HaTorah Knesset list signals a deep power struggle within the Lithuanian Haredi leadership. This internal conflict, centered around the influence of Rabbi Dov Landau versus Rabbi Moshe Hillel Hirsch, could reshape the political landscape for the Haredi community and potentially affect Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's ability to form future coalitions.
The ousting of Gafni, a long-serving parliamentarian, is attributed largely to David Shapira, a figure who has gained prominence within Rabbi Landau's circle. While Rabbi Hirsch also consented to the move, sources indicate Rabbi Landau's camp was the primary driving force, signifying a clear strengthening of their faction within the Lithuanian leadership.
Beyond personnel changes, the dispute reflects an ideological divergence on how to engage with the Israeli political system. Rabbi Hirsch's camp has adopted a more pragmatic approach towards the government, whereas Rabbi Landau's faction has pursued a more assertive stance, particularly concerning the sensitive issue of military conscription for Haredim.
This shift in power within Degel HaTorah has broader implications. It provides significant backing to the more confrontational approach taken by the Gur Hasidic faction and its allies against the Netanyahu government. Conversely, it may weaken political factions that have cultivated closer ties with Netanyahu, such as Shas leader Aryeh Deri and figures within Agudat Yisrael like Minister Meir Porush, who prioritize the continued rule of the right-wing bloc.
Ultimately, the internal upheaval within Degel HaTorah signifies a change in the balance of power among Lithuanian leaders, empowering a more hardline faction. This development could influence post-election alliances and Netanyahu's capacity to assemble his next government.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.