Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

YnetPolitics

Israel's Supreme Court Strikes Down Law Exempting Haredi Draft Dodgers

Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba

CenterNeutral tone

Hebrew · 22 newsrooms covering

Israel's High Court of Justice unanimously voided a law that halted arrests of Haredi draft evaders, citing procedural flaws and a violation of the right to equality. The court ruled the amendment was unconstitutional and improperly passed.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Supreme Court unanimously canceled law exempting Haredi draft dodgers.
  • Justices cited procedural flaws in the law's legislative process.
  • The court ruled the law unconstitutional, violating equality rights.
  • The law aimed to halt arrests of Haredi yeshiva students for five months.
  • The amendment significantly deviated from the original bill's intent.
Israel's Supreme Court Strikes Down Law Exempting Haredi Draft Dodgers
Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

Israel's High Court of Justice unanimously nullified a law that had halted arrests of Haredi (ultra-Orthodox) men evading military conscription. The nine-judge panel ruled that the amendment, passed in July 2026, was fundamentally flawed in its legislative process and unconstitutional.

In the lead opinion, Acting Supreme Court President Noam Sohlberg, with the agreement of all justices, stated that the amendment significantly deviated from the original bill's subject matter as presented in its first reading. Consequently, the court determined the law effectively never passed its first reading, rendering its subsequent passage fatally flawed and necessitating its cancellation.

Furthermore, eight of the nine justices, excluding Justice D. Mintz, found the law unconstitutional on its merits, asserting it severely infringes upon the constitutional right to equality without meeting the conditions of the limitation clause. The law, passed with a vote of 58 to 54, was intended to suspend enforcement actions, investigations, and arrests against yeshiva students who had not enlisted for a period of five months.

The legislation included a mechanism for declarations and checks, along with a list of yeshivas to be determined by the Defense Minister, considering recommendations from the Yeshiva Committee and oversight from the Ministry of Education. The legal advisor to the Foreign Affairs and Defense Committee had also sharply criticized the law, labeling it a "sectoral exemption" lacking a balancing mechanism to mitigate inequality and warning that such arrangements, without effective oversight or complementary sanctions, exacerbate constitutional difficulties.

YnetCentre · Rishon LeZion

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 26 outlets
First: Panet · Sep 3

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Open the Wire