Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

KipaPolitics

Israel's High Court Strikes Down Law Exempting Ultra-Orthodox Draft Dodgers

Translated & summarized from Kipa by baba

Religious-rightNeutral tone

Hebrew · 22 newsrooms covering

Israel's Supreme Court unanimously voided a law that halted enforcement against ultra-Orthodox draft evaders, citing both procedural flaws in its passage and its unconstitutionality on substantive grounds.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Supreme Court nullified law freezing draft enforcement for ultra-Orthodox.
  • Decision cited procedural violations in the Knesset's legislative process.
  • Majority also found the law unconstitutional on substantive grounds.
  • The ruling impacts thousands of ultra-Orthodox men evading service.
  • Justices ruled the amendment deviated significantly from the original bill.
Israel's High Court Strikes Down Law Exempting Ultra-Orthodox Draft Dodgers
Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

Israel's Supreme Court unanimously annulled an amendment to the Security Service Law that had frozen enforcement actions against ultra-Orthodox yeshiva students evading mandatory military service. The decision, rendered by an expanded panel of nine justices, focused on the legislative process itself.

In the lead opinion, Deputy Supreme Court President Noam Sohlberg, with the agreement of the other justices, determined that the amendment fundamentally deviated from the original bill's subject matter approved in its first reading, violating Knesset regulations. The justices concluded that the deviation was so substantial it undermined the entire legislative procedure, effectively rendering the amendment a law that had not passed its first reading.

Five petitions had been filed against Amendment No. 28, enacted on July 14, 2026, which had halted all enforcement against ultra-Orthodox individuals obligated to enlist but not reporting for service. However, the court's review extended beyond procedural flaws.

A majority of eight justices also ruled the amendment unconstitutional on substantive grounds. They asserted that freezing enforcement against these draft evaders severely infringes upon the core constitutional right to equality, and the conditions required to justify such an infringement were not met. Justice David Mintz was the sole judge who did not join the ruling on the amendment's unconstitutionality but still concurred that the procedural defect was sufficient cause for its cancellation.

KipaRight · Jerusalem

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 26 outlets
First: Panet · Sep 3

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Open the Wire