Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

SrugimPolitics

Supreme Court Strikes Down Law Freezing Draft Enforcement Against Haredim

Translated & summarized from Srugim by baba

Religious-rightNeutral tone

Hebrew · 22 newsrooms covering

Israel's Supreme Court has unanimously canceled a recent amendment to the Security Service Law that shielded ultra-Orthodox men from military draft enforcement. The court cited both procedural flaws in the legislation's passage and its unconstitutional infringement on the right to equality.

The story in 4 lines · by baba

  • Supreme Court voids law freezing draft enforcement for Haredim.
  • Law was criticized for procedural flaws and inequality.
  • Enforcement of military draft laws is now fully reinstated.
  • Amendment was passed just two months prior to the ruling.
Supreme Court Strikes Down Law Freezing Draft Enforcement Against Haredim
Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

Israel's Supreme Court, sitting as the High Court of Justice, unanimously voided an amendment to the Security Service Law that had been enacted just two months prior. The amendment, known as Amendment No. 28, had introduced a temporary provision to broadly halt all enforcement and arrest proceedings against ultra-Orthodox men who failed to enlist in the military. The court's decision, written by Deputy President Justice Noam Sohlberg and agreed upon by all nine justices, found a fundamental flaw in the legislative process.

Specifically, the court determined that the final version of the amendment significantly deviated from the bill that passed its first reading, violating Knesset procedural rules. This procedural defect rendered the amendment equivalent to a law that had never passed its first reading, necessitating its cancellation. The ruling stated that the legislative process contained a flaw that went to the root of the matter.

In addition to the procedural issue, eight of the nine justices ruled that the amendment was unconstitutional on its merits. They concluded that it severely infringed upon the core constitutional right to equality, an infringement that did not meet the conditions of the limitation clause. Justice David Mintz, while disagreeing on the constitutional merits, concurred with the decision to cancel the law due to the procedural flaw.

With the absolute order issued, the amendment is immediately nullified, and the enforcement provisions of the Security Service Law are fully reinstated. The ruling came in response to five petitions, including one from the "Free Israel" movement.

SrugimRight · Jerusalem

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 26 outlets
First: Panet · Sep 3

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Open the Wire