Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Arutz ShevaPolitics

Supreme Court Unanimously Strikes Down Law Halting Draft Evasion Arrests

Translated & summarized from Arutz Sheva by baba

RightNeutral tone

Hebrew · 22 newsrooms covering

Israel's Supreme Court unanimously voided a law that froze enforcement actions against ultra-Orthodox men evading military service. The court cited both procedural flaws in the legislation's passage and substantive constitutional issues regarding equality.

The story in 4 lines · by baba

  • Supreme Court unanimously canceled law halting draft evasion arrests.
  • Law was deemed flawed in legislative process and unconstitutional.
  • Eight justices found the law violated equality rights.
  • The amendment applied to ultra-Orthodox yeshiva students.
Supreme Court Unanimously Strikes Down Law Halting Draft Evasion Arrests
Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

Israel's Supreme Court, sitting as the High Court of Justice, unanimously nullified an amendment to the Security Service Law that had halted enforcement actions against ultra-Orthodox men evading military conscription. The decision was made by an expanded panel of nine justices following five petitions against the amendment, which was enacted in July and added a temporary provision freezing arrests, investigations, and enforcement for yeshiva students designated for service who did not report.

The court ruled that the amendment suffered from a fundamental flaw in the legislative process, as it significantly deviated from the original bill that passed its first reading. This procedural defect, described as a "root flaw," was sufficient on its own to invalidate the law. All justices agreed on this point, leading to the unanimous decision.

Furthermore, eight of the nine justices determined the amendment to be unconstitutional on substantive grounds. The majority opinion stated that the law severely infringed upon the core constitutional right to equality and did not meet the requirements of the "limitation clause," which allows for the restriction of rights only under specific, justified conditions. Justice David Mintz dissented on the constitutional issue but concurred with the majority regarding the procedural flaw.

The justices who comprised the panel were Deputy President Noam Sohlberg, and Justices Daphne Barak-Erez, David Mintz, Yael Vilaner, Ofer Grosskopf, Alex Stein, Gila Kenfy-Steinholtz, Yehiel Kasher, and Ruth Ronen. The court issued an absolute order canceling the amendment.

Arutz ShevaRight · Beit El

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 26 outlets
First: Panet · Sep 3

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Open the Wire