Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

YnetPolitics

Supreme Court Strikes Down Law Shielding Haredi Draft Dodgers

Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba

CenterNeutral tone

Hebrew · 22 newsrooms covering

Israel's High Court of Justice has canceled a law that protected Haredi draft dodgers from arrest, citing procedural flaws and a violation of the constitutional right to equality.

The story in 4 lines · by baba

  • Supreme Court canceled law shielding Haredi draft dodgers.
  • Law violated legislative process and equality rights.
  • Court cited procedural flaws in Knesset's handling.
  • Amendment disproportionately affected Haredi yeshiva students.
Supreme Court Strikes Down Law Shielding Haredi Draft Dodgers
Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

Israel's High Court of Justice has unanimously ruled to cancel an amendment to the Security Service Law that effectively froze the arrest of Haredi yeshiva students who evade military conscription, while other draft dodgers faced arrest. The court found the amendment, titled 'Freezing of Arrest, Investigation, or Enforcement Proceedings Against a Person Designated for Security Service Who is a Yeshiva Student, A Temporary Order,' to be unconstitutional due to a fundamental flaw in its legislative process.

According to the ruling, the amendment significantly deviated from the original bill that passed its first reading in the Knesset, violating Knesset rules. The court stated that, in effect, the amendment was treated as if it had not passed its first reading, rendering its legislative procedure fundamentally flawed and necessitating its cancellation.

Furthermore, in a separate decision by eight of the nine justices, the court determined that the amendment was unconstitutional in substance as well. It was found to severely infringe upon the core constitutional right to equality, failing to meet the conditions required by the limitation clause, which allows for restrictions on rights only under specific, justifiable circumstances.

YnetCentre · Rishon LeZion

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 26 outlets
First: Panet · Sep 3

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Open the Wire