Israeli Supreme Court Suspends Key Provisions of Media Weakening Law
Translated & summarized from N12 by baba
The Israeli Supreme Court temporarily blocked key parts of a law aimed at weakening media regulations, including lifting ownership restrictions and allowing unlicensed advertising on cable and satellite. This injunction preserves existing content and ethical standards while preventing deregulation of political advertising on certain channels.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Israeli Supreme Court issued a temporary injunction on media weakening law provisions.
- Suspended allowing HOT and yes to broadcast ads on cable and satellite immediately.
- Blocked lifting cross-ownership limits for HOT and yes to own news channels.
- Paused cancellation of structural separation between newsrooms and broadcasters.
- Maintained content investment and relocation obligations for Channels 14 and i24NEWS.
- Prevented unregulated paid political ads on cable and satellite by unsupervised channels.
On July 19, 2026, the Israeli Supreme Court issued a temporary injunction halting the immediate implementation of several controversial provisions in the media weakening law proposed by MK Karei. The suspended sections included allowing HOT and yes (Bezeq) to broadcast advertisements on cable and satellite platforms, lifting cross-ownership restrictions to permit these companies to own news channels, and expanding the i24NEWS channel's reach on HOT without a broadcasting license. The injunction also froze the cancellation of structural separation requirements between news companies and broadcasting entities, which critics argued exposed newsrooms to foreign-political and business interests of channel owners.
Additionally, the court paused the removal of mandatory investments in news content, such as the 50 million shekel requirement for Channel 14, and blocked the repeal of the obligation for Channels 14 and i24NEWS to relocate to Jerusalem, which had been linked to fines from the Second Authority for Television and Radio. The suspension effectively maintained existing broadcasting licenses and content commitments for Channels 12 and 13, preserving ethical and content regulations against incitement and inappropriate material.
The law's provisions would have allowed HOT, yes, i24NEWS, and other entities outside the Second Authority's supervision to air paid political campaign advertisements on cable and satellite without regulatory oversight. The Supreme Court's decision represents a significant check on legislative efforts to deregulate and consolidate media ownership in Israel, pending further judicial review.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 5Right 2Haredi 2Other 2
