Breaking· Politics· Updated
Clash Erupts in Netanyahu Trial Over Evidence Collection
A heated courtroom confrontation on Monday halted the testimony of former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit during the corruption trial of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the Jerusalem District Court. The clash erupted during Mandelblit's cross-examination when Netanyahu's defense attorney, Amit Haddad, accused the prosecution of misleading the former Attorney General and withholding crucial information from him during the investigations.
7 newsrooms · 2 languages · sinceWhat happened
- 01A heated argument between defense attorney Amit Haddad and prosecutor Yehudit Tirosh temporarily halted the corruption trial of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
- 02The confrontation occurred at the Jerusalem District Court during the cross-examination of former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit.
- 03Defense attorney Amit Haddad accused the prosecution of misleading Mandelblit and withholding crucial investigation details from him.
- 04Haddad claimed that investigators retrieved emails from Shaul Elovitch and Benjamin Netanyahu in July 2017 without Mandelblit's knowledge.
- 05Prosecutor Yehudit Tirosh defended her office, rejected the accusations of concealment, and accused Haddad of presenting a distorted picture of the facts.
- 06Former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit testified that he was unaware of any unlawful evidence collection but maintained full confidence in the prosecution.
- 07Judge Rivka Friedman-Feldman suspended the hearing and summoned the legal teams to her chambers before the trial resumed.
Haddad claimed that in July 2017, a senior official in the Israel Securities Authority investigation unit ordered the retrieval of materials from the email inboxes of Shaul Elovitch and Benjamin Netanyahu without Mandelblit's knowledge. Haddad presented documents that the defense argues were obtained without the Attorney General's approval and in excess of search warrants. Mandelblit testified that he was unaware of any unlawful evidence collection, stating he made his decisions under the assumption that the evidence presented to him was legally gathered, though he expressed full confidence in the prosecution and doubted they would intentionally hide information.
The argument escalated when Haddad accused the prosecution of trapping Mandelblit, telling prosecutor Yehudit Tirosh that he understood her distress because this was "the case of her life." Tirosh retorted that her family was her life, adding that the prosecutors were simply doing their jobs and were not the defendants. After Tirosh accused Haddad of insolence and presenting a distorted picture of the facts, Judge Rivka Friedman-Feldman suspended the hearing and summoned the lawyers to her chambers. The proceedings resumed after the brief recess.
Summarized by baba from the reports of 5 newsrooms. Updated
Latest report: 0404. Read 0404’s originalThe coverage
7 newsrooms on this story
Who covered it
- LeftNone
- Centre2
- Right4
- HarediNone
- ArabNone
- Other1
Not in the Left or Arab press
