Clash Erupts in Netanyahu Trial Over Evidence Collection
Translated & summarized from 0404 by baba
A confrontation between prosecutor Judith Tirosh and defense counsel Amit Haddad occurred during the cross-examination of former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit in the Netanyahu trial. The argument focused on the legality of evidence collection, with Tirosh accusing Haddad of misrepresentation and Haddad claiming the prosecution paraphrased original documents. Mandelblit stated he was unaware of any legal issues with how evidence was gathered.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Prosecutor Judith Tirosh and defense counsel Amit Haddad clashed during the Netanyahu trial.
- The dispute concerned whether emails were used to expand the investigation.
- Tirosh accused Haddad of presenting a "180-degree opposite picture" of the facts.
- Haddad claimed he presented original documents, not prosecution paraphrases.
- Former AG Avichai Mandelblit stated he was unaware of unlawful evidence collection.
A heated exchange occurred between prosecutor Judith Tirosh and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's defense counsel, Amit Haddad, during the cross-examination of former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit in the Netanyahu trial at the Jerusalem District Court. The dispute centered on whether emails concerning Netanyahu's coverage were used to expand the investigation. Tirosh accused Haddad of misrepresenting facts, stating, "You are presenting a 180-degree opposite picture." Haddad countered, accusing Tirosh of presenting a misleading position and insisting, "I am presenting original documents, not a paraphrase from the prosecution." During the hearing, Haddad presented documents that the defense claims were obtained without the Attorney General's approval and in excess of search warrants. Mandelblit stated that he was not informed of any legal issues regarding the collection of these materials, saying, "I was not told the materials were obtained unlawfully." The former Attorney General explained that he made his decisions based on the assumption that the evidence presented to him was legally gathered.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 2Right 4Other 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
