Mandelblit Testimony Halts Amid Fierce Exchange Between Netanyahu Lawyer and Prosecutor
Translated & summarized from Kipa by baba
The testimony of former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit was unexpectedly halted in Jerusalem on Sunday due to a sharp dispute between Prime Minister Netanyahu's lawyer, Amit Haddad, and prosecutor Yehudit Tirosh. Haddad accused the prosecution of withholding information from Mandelblit, while Tirosh defended the prosecution's actions. Mandelblit stated he would be surprised if information was intentionally hidden, expressing confidence in the prosecution. The hearing is part of the second day of Mandelblit's testimony.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit's testimony was halted amid a heated argument between Netanyahu's lawyer and a prosecutor.
- Netanyahu's lawyer, Amit Haddad, accused the prosecution of deliberately withholding information from Mandelblit.
- Prosecutor Yehudit Tirosh defended the prosecution's work, stating, "We are not the defendants here."
- Mandelblit expressed he would be surprised if information was intentionally hidden, but maintained "full confidence" in the prosecution.
- The judge, Rivka Friedman-Feldman, interrupted the proceedings and called the lawyers into her chambers.
- The testimony is part of the second day of Mandelblit's appearance at the Jerusalem District Court.
The testimony of former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit was unexpectedly halted on Sunday during a heated exchange between Amit Haddad, the attorney representing Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, and prosecutor Yehudit Tirosh. Judge Rivka Friedman-Feldman interrupted the proceedings and called the lawyers into her chambers.
The confrontation erupted after Haddad accused Mandelblit of being misled and claimed that crucial information was withheld from him during the investigations. Haddad told Tirosh, "I understand the distress, there is someone sitting here for whom this is the case of her life." Tirosh retorted loudly, "My life is my family. We are all prosecutors doing our job. We are not the defendants here."
Mandelblit addressed claims that the prosecution deliberately concealed information from him, stating, "Since this is repeated again and again, a thesis is presented that constantly repeats itself, that the harm is intentional and malicious. The State Prosecutor's Office intentionally hid information from the Attorney General." However, he added, "I would be very surprised if this turns out to be true. I am not aware of a situation where things were hidden from me. It could be, but I am not yet convinced of this."
Haddad pressed Mandelblit, suggesting he was "set up" and that information was not disclosed to him. Mandelblit responded that the prosecution guided the cases and expressed "full confidence" in its staff, calling the prosecution "my long arm." He reiterated that he would be surprised if the claims of intentional concealment were true, deeming such an act serious if proven.
During his testimony, Haddad also questioned Mandelblit about possible past remarks regarding journalists Gidi Weitz and Raviv Drucker, asking if he had called them "great enemies of the Prime Minister." Mandelblit responded, "It could be" to both instances. Earlier, after an exchange with a Channel 14 reporter, the judge had advised Mandelblit to try and ignore such interactions. The hearing is taking place at the Jerusalem District Court as part of the second day of his testimony.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 2Right 4Other 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
