Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Sport5Security

AI Referee Rules Beitar Jerusalem Was Denied a Penalty

Translated & summarized from Sport5 by baba

SportsNeutral tone

Hebrew · 2 newsrooms covering

An AI referee system has ruled that Beitar Jerusalem was wrongly denied a penalty in a recent match. The AI determined with 95% certainty that a foul occurred inside the box, warranting a penalty and a yellow card. The on-field referee and VAR did not call the foul, despite contact with player Omer Atzili.

The story in 4 lines · by baba

  • AI referee determined Beitar Jerusalem deserved a penalty and yellow card.
  • The AI system analyzed a foul on Omer Atzili in the penalty area.
  • On-field referee David Foxman and VAR did not award the penalty.
  • The AI cited a clear foul preventing a scoring opportunity.
AI Referee Rules Beitar Jerusalem Was Denied a Penalty
Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

An artificial intelligence referee has determined that Israeli Premier League club Beitar Jerusalem should have been awarded a penalty during a recent match. The incident occurred when Beitar player Omer Atzili entered the penalty area and made contact with opponent David Keltins, leading to Atzili's fall. Beitar players claimed it should have been a penalty, but the on-field referee, David Foxman, did not call a foul, and the VAR team did not intervene.

To address such situations, an AI referee system was developed, trained on FIFA rules and tested with various scenarios. This AI system analyzed the play and concluded with 95% certainty that a penalty and a yellow card should have been issued. The AI stated that the referee's decision to continue play was incorrect, as a clear foul occurred inside the box.

The AI explained that the defending player attempted to reach the ball but made contact with the attacker's leg, causing him to fall without first touching the ball. Because the foul occurred during an attempt to play the ball and prevented a clear scoring opportunity within the penalty area, the AI determined a yellow card was the appropriate disciplinary action.

Sport5Other · Tel Aviv

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 3 outlets
First: Sport5 · 1h ago

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Related stories · 4

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the Wire