Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

N12Sports

AI Judge Rules on Controversial Foul in Maccabi Tel Aviv Match

Translated & summarized from N12 by baba

CenterNeutral tone

Hebrew · 2 newsrooms covering

An AI soccer referee system has determined that Maccabi Tel Aviv defender Raz Shlomo correctly received a yellow card and a penalty was rightly called against him for a foul in the box. The AI, trained on FIFA rules, ruled with 95% certainty that Shlomo did not deserve a red card. The controversial play occurred during a 2-2 draw between Maccabi Tel Aviv and Maccabi Petah Tikva.

The story in 4 lines · by baba

  • AI judge ruled Raz Shlomo deserved yellow card, not red, for foul in penalty box.
  • The AI system analyzed a play from the Maccabi Tel Aviv vs. Maccabi Petah Tikva match.
  • The foul resulted in a penalty kick and a 2-2 draw for the teams.
  • The AI was trained on FIFA rules and made its decision with 95% certainty.

An artificial intelligence system developed by Sport 5 has ruled on a contentious play during a recent soccer match between Maccabi Tel Aviv and Maccabi Petah Tikva, which ended in a 2-2 draw. The AI, trained on FIFA rules, analyzed a foul committed by Maccabi Tel Aviv defender Raz Shlomo.

In the 90th minute, Shlomo stepped on Guy Dezent's foot inside the penalty area, resulting in a penalty kick and a yellow card for Shlomo. Maccabi Petah Tikva converted the penalty, tying the game at 1-1. Later, Eitan Tibi scored a late equalizer for Maccabi Petah Tikva in stoppage time.

The AI system, with 95% certainty, determined that Shlomo should not have received a red card. It concluded that the yellow card and penalty were the correct decisions. The AI explained that while Shlomo's late tackle constituted a foul that denied a clear goal-scoring opportunity (DOGSO), the foul occurred within the penalty area while attempting to play the ball. This specific context, according to the AI's interpretation of FIFA Law 12, warrants a reduction in punishment from a red card to a yellow card, as it did not involve excessive or extreme brutality.

Earlier in the match, Maccabi Tel Aviv had taken a 1-0 lead, but Maccabi Petah Tikva equalized at the start of the second half. Maccabi Tel Aviv regained the lead in the 90th minute after Shlomo initiated a play that led to a goal by Ester Suker, assisted by Shagi Yehezkel. However, this goal was insufficient to secure a win for Maccabi Tel Aviv.

N12Centre · Neve Ilan

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

SportsTopic

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 3 outlets
First: Sport5 · 2h ago

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Open the Wire