Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Ongoing Story· Day 2

Controversial Penalty Denies Beitar Jerusalem Victory Against Kiryat Shmona

3 developments

MakoSports

Penalty Against Beitar Jerusalem? Not Necessarily a Mistake

Translated & summarized from Mako by baba

CenterCharged tone

Hebrew · 1 newsroom

Sports commentator the commentator discussed a controversial penalty awarded to Hapoel Hadera against Beitar Jerusalem in a 1-1 draw. The commentator believes the penalty was not necessarily a clear error, as there was physical contact, even if the ball was not touched. He noted that VAR could not intervene due to the physical contact, which is a matter of referee discretion. The commentator concluded that while he might not have awarded the penalty himself, he is not convinced it was a mistake.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Commentator the commentator suggested a controversial penalty against Beitar Jerusalem was not a clear error.
  • The commentator observed physical contact with a player, which he stated can cause a fall.
  • He noted that VAR cannot intervene when there is physical contact, as it is a referee's judgment.
  • The penalty was awarded to Hapoel Hadera in a 1-1 draw just before the end of the match.
  • The commentator stated that more questionable penalties have been seen in previous matches.

Sports commentator the commentator addressed a controversial penalty awarded to Hapoel Hadera in their dramatic 1-1 draw against Beitar Jerusalem on Saturday. The penalty, given just before the final whistle, sparked debate. The commentator stated that while he did not see contact with the ball by the Beitar player, he observed contact with the player himself, noting that even a slight touch at speed can cause a player to fall. He dismissed claims that the penalty was unprecedentedly erroneous, asserting that more questionable penalties have been seen. The commentator also explained that VAR could not intervene because a physical touch occurred, which he noted is a matter of referee discretion. He added that the Referees Association has repeatedly clarified that VAR cannot intervene if there is physical contact. Ultimately, the commentator positioned himself as the referee, stating that while he might not have personally awarded the penalty, he is not certain it was a officiating error.

MakoCentre · Neve Ilan

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

SportsTopic

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Open the Wire