Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Ongoing Story· Day 4

Former Navy Chief: No Current Reason to Attack Iran

2 developments

HamalSecurity

Ex-Navy Chief: No Need to Attack Iran Now Unless Nuclear Progress is Imminent

Translated & summarized from Hamal by baba

CenterNeutral tone

Hebrew · 1 newsroom

Former Navy commander Eliezer Marom advised against attacking Iran at this time, unless there is intelligence of immediate nuclear progress. He stated that current strikes would not significantly impact Iran's nuclear program or lead to regime change. Marom suggested continued economic pressure and patience, awaiting potential U.S.-Iran agreements or internal regime collapse.

The story in 6 lines · by baba

  • Former Navy commander Eliezer Marom says attacking Iran now is unnecessary.
  • Marom advised against military action without intelligence of immediate nuclear progress.
  • He believes current strikes would not significantly alter Iran's nuclear capabilities.
  • Marom suggested continued economic pressure and patience are the best approach.
  • He noted that regime change scenarios are not imminent.
  • Marom cited Iran's nuclear program as its key leverage.

Former Navy commander and senior researcher Eliezer Marom stated on Sunday that there is currently no need to attack Iran, unless there is intelligence indicating immediate progress toward nuclear weapons. Speaking on 103fm, Marom cautioned against military action that would not yield significant results, emphasizing that Iran's nuclear program is its "one trump card" it is unwilling to relinquish.

Marom explained that current attacks are unlikely to alter Iran's nuclear capabilities, questioning the objective of such strikes. He outlined two scenarios that could change the situation: an agreement between the U.S. and Iran, or the fall of the Iranian regime. However, he deemed both unlikely in the near future, advocating for patience.

He also commented on U.S. President Donald Trump's assurances to the Iranian people, suggesting that hopes for regime change through military pressure and internal developments have proven overly optimistic. Marom noted the difficulty in predicting the timing of regime collapses, even under significant pressure.

While acknowledging Iran's severe economic struggles, including inflation, unemployment, and energy shortages, Marom reiterated that an attack is unnecessary unless there is concrete evidence of an imminent nuclear test. He believes further airstrikes alone will not topple the regime and recommended continued economic pressure while awaiting developments.

HamalCentre · Tel Aviv

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Related stories · 2

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the Wire