Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

MaarivPolitics

Author Claims Trump's Role in Likud Election Campaign Will Cost Israel

Translated & summarized from Maariv by baba

CenterCharged tone

Hebrew · 1 newsroom

Avi Benayahu claims Donald Trump's appointment as chairman of the Likud election campaign will harm Israel, which he describes as being in political chaos and facing significant security and diplomatic challenges. Benayahu criticizes the current government and emphasizes the need for a strong, unifying leadership. He also discusses the challenges of forming a new government, the role of Arab citizens in Israel's future, and the unreliability of opinion polls.

The story in 6 lines · by baba

  • Donald Trump has become chairman of the Likud election campaign, according to Avi Benayahu.
  • Benayahu argues Israel faces immense security, diplomatic, and economic challenges.
  • He calls for a strong, stable, and trustworthy government to unite the nation.
  • The author criticizes the outgoing government and questions the possibility of forming a new one.
  • Benayahu advocates for the integration of Arab citizens into the government.
  • He also expresses skepticism about the accuracy and value of opinion polls.

Avi Benayahu, writing for an Israeli news aggregator, asserts that Donald Trump has become the chairman of the Likud party's election campaign, a move he believes will have significant negative consequences for Israel. Benayahu argues that the country is currently in political chaos and faces immense challenges in security, diplomacy, economics, and public relations, including threats from Iran, Hamas, and Hezbollah, as well as potential diplomatic isolation and sanctions. He stresses the urgent need for a strong, stable, and trustworthy government to unite the nation and prepare it for these challenges.

Benayahu criticizes the outgoing right-wing government, stating it has been rejected by the public and is unfit for the task. He questions whether a reasonable government can be formed without new elections, citing political entrenchment, unfulfilled campaign promises, and a lack of trust in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu due to his history of broken agreements. The author suggests that both the Israeli and US presidents may need to take shared responsibility to advance the situation, especially if Netanyahu demonstrates a change in character and approach.

The article highlights the post-election deadlock, where no bloc can form a government while adhering to its promises. Benayahu uses the example of Kiryat Shmona, whose residents he feels were mistreated by the Netanyahu government, suffering both displacement and hardship upon their return. Despite his support for the "change bloc," Benayahu states he accepts democratic rules, even if Netanyahu secures another term.

Benayahu contends that Netanyahu, facing political and personal pressure as a defendant in ongoing trials, is driven by survival instincts. He draws a parallel between Netanyahu's ability to overshadow the October massacre and Arik Sharon's past actions. However, Benayahu emphasizes that Israel needs a statesmanlike leader focused on national interests, unity, and an end to division, rather than just a campaign manager.

Furthermore, Benayahu addresses the concept of a "Zionist government," arguing that while some ultra-Orthodox politicians may not fit the traditional definition, they could be partners in governing, especially those who condemn terrorism and recognize Israel as the Jewish state. He points out that Arab citizens of Israel, comprising 20% of the population, will increasingly influence the country's future. Benayahu advocates for their proactive integration into the government, starting with parties like Ra'am, to avoid alienating them and potentially turning Israel into a state like South Africa. He also criticizes the reliance on opinion polls, suggesting they can be misleading and that the public should await official election results.

MaarivCentre · Jerusalem

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Open the Wire