Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Channel 13Politics

United Torah Judaism Ignores High Court Ruling on Election Day Monitoring

Translated & summarized from Channel 13 by baba

CenterCharged tone

Hebrew · 2 newsrooms covering

The United Torah Judaism party has defied a Supreme Court ruling by instructing its poll watchers to report voter attendance in real-time. The Supreme Court had previously outlawed this practice, deeming it a violation of privacy. Justice Minister Yariv Levin criticized the court's decision, alleging political motives.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • United Torah Judaism party will continue real-time voter reporting despite Supreme Court ban.
  • Supreme Court ruled the practice violates the fundamental right to privacy.
  • The court stated the Central Elections Committee lacks authority for this practice.
  • Justice Minister Yariv Levin accused the court of manipulating election rules.
  • The ruling followed petitions against the Central Elections Committee's practice.
United Torah Judaism Ignores High Court Ruling on Election Day Monitoring
Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

The United Torah Judaism party has instructed its representatives at polling stations to continue reporting in real-time on voters' attendance, despite a Supreme Court ruling against the practice. The party's directive, issued on Tuesday, involves manual recording of who has voted and who has not. This action directly contradicts a September decision by the Supreme Court, which unanimously accepted petitions against the Central Elections Committee's practice of allowing parties to track voter turnout in real-time. Justices Yael Vilner, Alex Stein, and Khaled Kabub ruled that this procedure infringes upon the fundamental right to privacy. Justice Vilner, in the main opinion, stated the practice was illegal due to a lack of legal authorization and its violation of privacy rights, specifically contravening the Privacy Protection Law. The justices emphasized that the Central Elections Committee lacks the authority to legitimize such a practice without explicit legislation. The ruling sparked significant anger within the political establishment. Justice Minister Yariv Levin sharply criticized the justices, suggesting their decision was motivated by the upcoming government's power to appoint Supreme Court justices. He accused them of "desperately changing the rules of the game" to suppress voter turnout and regain control of the country, asserting that "all means are permissible" to influence election results.

Channel 13Centre · Tel Aviv

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Open the Wire