Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Ongoing Story· Day 3

Israeli Arab Groups Ask High Court to Ban Guns at Polling Stations

6 developments

YnetPolitics

Israel's Supreme Court Rejects Petition Against Armed Poll Workers

Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba

CenterNeutral tone

Hebrew · 1 newsroom

Israel's Supreme Court rejected a petition by the Adalah Center and the Joint List to ban armed poll workers in voting stations. The petition argued that armed observers, particularly from the Likud and Religious Zionism parties, could intimidate Arab voters. The court's dismissal suggests it found no legal basis to prohibit armed personnel at polling sites.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Israel's Supreme Court rejected a petition to ban armed poll workers in voting stations.
  • The Adalah Center and Joint List filed the petition citing concerns for Arab voters.
  • Likud and Religious Zionism planned to deploy around 2,000 observers in Arab areas.
  • Petitioners argued armed presence could intimidate voters and endanger lives.
  • The court found no sufficient legal grounds to grant the petition.

Israel's Supreme Court, known as the High Court of Justice (Bagatz), has dismissed a petition that sought to prohibit individuals serving in polling stations from carrying weapons within voting areas during Knesset elections. The petition was filed by the Adalah Center and the Joint List, who argued that the presence of armed individuals could intimidate Arab voters, particularly in light of a campaign by the Likud and Religious Zionism parties to deploy approximately 2,000 observers, many of whom are yeshiva students from the Religious Zionism movement, in "Arab centers." The petitioners contended that this armed presence, coupled with a political climate that frames Arab citizens as a threat to election integrity, could deter voters and endanger lives.

The court's decision did not provide a detailed explanation in its initial ruling, but the rejection implies that the court found no sufficient legal grounds to grant the request. The background to the petition highlighted concerns that the deployment of armed observers in areas with significant Arab populations could create a hostile environment, potentially impacting voter turnout and safety. The parties behind the petition had specifically pointed to the stated intention of the Likud and Religious Zionism to deploy these observers as the primary trigger for their legal action.

YnetCentre · Rishon LeZion

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Open the Wire