Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Ongoing Story· Day 3

Israeli Arab Groups Ask High Court to Ban Guns at Polling Stations

6 developments

Al-ShamsPolitics

Israeli Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Ban Guns at Arab Polling Stations

Translated & summarized from Al-Shams by baba

CommunityNeutral tone

Arabic · 1 newsroom

Israel's Supreme Court rejected a petition to ban firearms carried by election workers at polling stations in Arab towns and mixed cities. The petition, filed by Adalah and the Joint List, argued armed representatives could deter Arab voters. The court deferred to police assessments that no significant threat warranted a ban, though weapons must be carried discreetly and used only for self-defense. Arab leaders criticized the decision, fearing it would intimidate voters and suppress turnout, while the Prime Minister is reportedly concerned about rising Arab participation.

The story in 6 lines · by baba

  • Israel's Supreme Court rejected a petition to ban firearms at polling stations in Arab towns.
  • The Joint List and Adalah Center argued armed election workers could deter Arab voters.
  • The court deferred to police assessments that no significant threat warranted a ban.
  • Election workers carrying weapons must do so discreetly and only for self-defense.
  • Arab leaders criticized the ruling, fearing voter intimidation and suppressed turnout.
  • Prime Minister Netanyahu is reportedly concerned about increased Arab voter participation.
Israeli Supreme Court Rejects Plea to Ban Guns at Arab Polling Stations
Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

Israel's Supreme Court on Sunday evening rejected a petition filed by the Adalah Center and the Joint List that sought to prevent election workers from carrying firearms inside polling stations during the Knesset elections. The petition was prompted by concerns that armed party representatives could deter Arab voters and incite confrontations in Arab towns and mixed cities. The Likud and Religious Zionism parties had announced plans to deploy approximately 2,000 observers to polling stations in Arab towns and mixed cities, raising fears about the impact of armed representatives on voter security and freedom to vote.

The state argued in its response that there was no reason to intervene in the Israeli Police's professional assessments, which found no tangible danger or operational necessity to ban firearms for election workers. The state added that individuals carrying weapons would receive specific instructions emphasizing that their use is permitted only for self-defense and that weapons should be carried discreetly. The police also stated there were no indications of expected disturbances, disruption of the electoral process, or planned threats against voters.

Justice Gila Kenaf-Steinmetz stated that the petitioners' concerns were considered in election day preparations but did not justify changing existing instructions, given intelligence, situational assessments, and security arrangements. The court ultimately decided not to interfere with the police's and the Central Elections Committee chairman's estimations, noting the police's broad authority in public security matters.

Following the ruling, Yousef Jabareen, head of the Joint List, stated that fair elections require banning weapons and armed individuals in polling stations. He criticized the Supreme Court for not providing adequate protection for the Arab public's rights and suggested that the government and right-wing parties aim to weaken Arab participation. Jabareen asserted that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is concerned about increased Arab voter turnout and that the public will respond to incitement with broad participation.

The Adalah Center criticized the state's and election committee's stance for ignoring the core concern: deterring Arab voters due to the presence of weapons carried by organized right-wing activists. Adalah argued that the decision to allow party representatives to carry weapons was based on a police assessment made before the Likud and Religious Zionism announced their campaign, and these factors should have been considered. The center also pointed out the contradiction between allowing firearms, including long guns, and requiring representatives to pledge to carry them discreetly, especially when thousands of police and security personnel are already deployed to ensure order.

Al-ShamsArab · Nazareth

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Open the Wire