Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Ongoing Story· Today

AI Referee Rules Beit Shemesh Player Should Have Received Red Card

2 developments

Sport5Security

AI Referee Rules Bryan Carvallal Should Have Received Red Card

Translated & summarized from Sport5 by baba

SportsCharged tone

Hebrew · 1 newsroom

An AI referee has ruled that Beitar Jerusalem player Bryan Carvallal should have received a red card for stepping on an opponent during a match against Hapoel Petah Tikva. The on-field referee and VAR did not penalize the foul. The AI, trained on FIFA rules, determined the action constituted serious foul play, even if a prior foul was called for Carvallal.

The story in 4 lines · by baba

  • AI referee determined Bryan Carvallal should have received a red card for stepping on an opponent.
  • The on-field referee and VAR did not penalize the foul during the Beitar Jerusalem vs. Hapoel Petah Tikva match.
  • The AI cited FIFA's Law 12, defining the action as serious foul play.
  • The AI concluded Carvallal should have been red-carded despite a potential prior foul call.

An AI referee has determined that Beitar Jerusalem player Bryan Carvallal should have been shown a red card during a recent match against Hapoel Petah Tikva. The incident occurred when Carvallal stepped on the ankle of opponent Karim Kimbaidi, who was on the ground. Despite the clear foul, referee Yoav Mizrahi allowed play to continue, and the VAR team did not intervene to overturn the decision.

To address such situations, an AI referee system was developed, trained on FIFA's Laws of the Game and tested with various scenarios. The AI analyzed the play, stating, "During the sequence of play, the player in white (Carvallal) steps with his studs directly onto the shin/ankle area of the player in blue (Kimbaidi) who is on the ground." It cited Law 12, which defines reckless tackles or challenges that endanger the opponent's safety as serious foul play warranting a red card.

The AI further elaborated that even if a prior foul was called in favor of Carvallal, the subsequent stepping action constitutes violent or reckless conduct independent of the ball. The AI concluded that if a foul was indeed called for Carvallal before the stepping incident, play should have restarted with a free kick for Beitar Jerusalem, but Carvallal should have been issued a red card.

Sport5Other · Tel Aviv

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Related stories · 1

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the Wire