Wire

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Kikar HaShabbatEconomy

Court Orders Property Owners to Pay for Full Public Lot After Minor Encroachment

Translated & summarized from Kikar HaShabbat by baba

ReligiousNeutral tone

Hebrew · 1 newsroom

Four property rights holders in Julis were ordered by a court to pay the Israel Land Authority NIS 73,065 for unauthorized use of public land. Despite claims of only a minor 10-centimeter encroachment, the judge ruled their actions prevented the state from using the entire 488-square-meter lot. The ruling followed a 2013 eviction order that was allegedly not fully complied with. The total payment, including costs and fees, amounts to NIS 88,765.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Four property owners must pay NIS 73,065 for unauthorized use of public land in Julis.
  • A judge ruled the encroachment prevented the state from using the entire 488-square-meter lot.
  • Defendants claimed only a 10-centimeter intrusion, but evidence showed extensive use.
  • The ruling stems from a 2013 eviction order that was allegedly not fully obeyed.
  • Total payment, including costs and fees, reaches NIS 88,765.

A magistrate's court in Kiryat has ordered four property rights holders in the town of Julis to pay the Israel Land Authority (ILA) NIS 73,065 for unauthorized use of adjacent public land over several years. The defendants had claimed their encroachment was minimal, only a few centimeters, but Judge Yuval Waserkrug ruled that their actions effectively prevented the state from utilizing the entire 488-square-meter lot.

The dispute dates back to 2009 when the ILA first sued for eviction. A 2013 ruling ordered the removal of construction elements, a concrete slab, and plantings that extended onto public land. However, the ILA contended that the defendants continued to use the land even after this judgment.

In 2020, enforcement proceedings began, leading to a financial claim for usage fees from 2014 to 2020. The defendants argued that they had removed most of the encroaching structures, with only a 10-centimeter intrusion remaining along a 4-meter length. They also claimed they shouldn't be charged for the entire lot and that the ILA itself had failed to remove a concrete fence and iron gate as previously ordered.

However, court-examined inspection reports and photographs showed a different picture, including a concrete slab, a fenced yard, a gate, and balcony elements. A 2016 photo showed a vehicle parked on the slab, and 2020 documentation indicated the slab occupied a significant portion of the lot. The judge determined that even if parts of a balcony were later dismantled, the use of public land persisted throughout the relevant period.

The court accepted the ILA's argument that the use of the concrete slab and other elements prevented the land from being marketed or leased to others. The ruling was based not just on a boundary line violation but on the overall use of the land and the impairment of the lot's full utilization. The ILA's claim for usage fees was based on an appraiser's opinion valuing annual usage at 6% of the land's value, a calculation the defendants did not contest with their own appraisal.

The ILA initially sought NIS 77,730, but the court reduced the claim due to the statute of limitations, allowing charges only from June 17, 2014. The final sum of NIS 73,065, including VAT, was ordered, along with NIS 7,000 in court costs and NIS 8,700 in attorney fees, totaling NIS 88,765 before interest and linkage adjustments. The judge noted the ILA must still remove the fence and gate as per the earlier ruling, but this does not exempt the defendants from the payment.

Kikar HaShabbatHaredi · Bnei Brak

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

EconomyTopic

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 1 outlets
First: Kikar HaShabbat · 1h ago

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Coverage from Kikar HaShabbat

Open the Wire