Kan NewsPolitics15:30

Hezbollah Faces Growing Discontent Among Lebanese Shia Supporters

By רועי קייס, רועי קייס

Translated & summarized from Kan News by baba

PublicNeutral tone

Hebrew · 3 newsrooms covering

Plus

A recent poll indicates growing discontent among Lebanese Shia with Hezbollah's leadership and its weapons, though a majority still express confidence in the organization. The survey revealed that 66.4% favor transferring Hezbollah's arms to the state, and 42.1% are dissatisfied with its wartime conduct. Hezbollah is attempting to retain support through financial aid programs for war-affected families, offering up to $14,000 for destroyed homes. However, the long-term impact of these shifts remains uncertain without a viable alternative political structure.

The story in 6 lines · by baba

A poll shows 66.4% of Lebanese Shia want Hezbollah's weapons transferred to the state.
42.1% of Lebanese Shia expressed dissatisfaction with Hezbollah's wartime leadership.
Despite criticism, 59.5% of Lebanese Shia still have some confidence in Hezbollah.
Hezbollah is offering financial aid, up to $14,000, for war-destroyed homes.
Property owners in Tyre reportedly opposed a Hezbollah-linked financial branch due to attack fears.
The poll was conducted in September among 800 Shia Lebanese aged 18 and over.

Hezbollah Faces Growing Discontent Among Lebanese Shia Supporters — Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

A recent poll suggests that Hezbollah may be experiencing a decline in support among the Lebanese Shia population, the demographic that has been its power base for decades. The survey, conducted in September by Statistics Lebanon among 800 Shia Lebanese aged 18 and over, revealed that 66.4% of respondents favor transferring Hezbollah's weapons to the state, compared to 29.6% who prefer the organization retain them. While this indicates a desire to limit the group's military power, it does not necessarily translate to an immediate, unconditional disarmament.

Furthermore, the survey highlighted significant dissatisfaction with the organization's leadership, with 42.1% expressing disappointment, anger, or concern over its conduct during the recent war and its consequences. Despite this, a majority of 59.5% still expressed some level of confidence in Hezbollah, indicating a complex relationship where support can coexist with criticism and a desire for change.

Hezbollah's influence stems not only from its ideology and ties to Iran but also from its role as a provider of essential services, employment, and a sense of security for a community historically marginalized. The organization has built its strength by filling a void left by the state, offering status and influence within Lebanon's fragmented political system. Military setbacks, however severe, have not erased this foundational support.

However, in some areas, the presence that once promised protection now evokes fear. An example from Tyre illustrates this shift: property owners reportedly opposed the opening of a branch of Al-Qard Al-Hasan, a financial institution linked to Hezbollah, due to concerns it would become a target for Israeli attacks. This incident, while not indicative of widespread rebellion, shows how an affiliated institution can be perceived as a risk to homes and livelihoods.

Two years after the killing of Hassan Nasrallah in a September 27, 2024, Israeli strike in Beirut, Hezbollah faces challenges beyond military and leadership losses. It is now grappling with its standing among families who have lost homes, income, and stability, questioning the value received for their sacrifices. The organization has announced a relief program offering up to $14,000 for main homes destroyed in Beirut and its southern suburbs, and up to $12,000 in other areas, to cover rent and furnishings, though this aid is still being processed.

While these findings suggest a potential erosion of support, a single survey does not confirm a historical turning point. The data was collected solely from the Shia community, and a comprehensive understanding requires longitudinal comparisons. Resistance to a local branch does not equate to a willingness to confront Hezbollah publicly. Lasting change will depend on the emergence of a strong, cross-sectarian Lebanese alternative government. Until then, dissatisfaction with Hezbollah may deepen without severing the dependency on it.