Why Israelis Still Vote for Netanyahu After Major Crises
Translated & summarized from Haaretz by baba
Despite the October 7th massacre and ongoing crises, many Israelis continue to vote for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, baffling critics. Analysts suggest his supporters view him as a father figure or are drawn to his cynical approach, which offers a sense of security and insider knowledge. Netanyahu's strategy of embracing the gap between words and actions and avoiding clear future platforms allows diverse supporters to feel represented. The article argues that while cynicism offers a temporary shield, it ultimately weakens the resolve to create real change, making voter turnout crucial for the upcoming election.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Many Israelis continue to vote for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu despite the October 7th massacre and other crises.
- Supporters may view Netanyahu as a father figure or be drawn to his cynical political strategy.
- Netanyahu's approach involves embracing the gap between his words and actions, turning perceived flaws into admiration.
- His party has not published a clear platform since 2013, allowing diverse supporters to feel represented.
- The article argues that cynicism offers temporary strength but long-term weakness, hindering the possibility of change.
- The upcoming election's key battle may be over voter turnout, encouraging people to overcome cynicism.
A deep sense of despair and bewilderment is expressed regarding the continued support for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, referred to as "Bibi," despite the October 7th massacre, the high cost of living, the war with Iran, and internal violence. The author questions what it will take to change the minds of these voters, noting that even devastating events have not swayed them.
Drawing on psychological perspectives, the article suggests that Netanyahu's supporters may view him as a father figure, attributing to him qualities he doesn't possess and clinging to a fantasy unshaken by reality. This is likened to a cult-like devotion. A contrasting view from a Channel 14 psychologist might suggest that supporters of the opposing side also see a father figure, seeking revenge and blaming him for their troubles, also characterizing it as a cult.
The piece argues that Netanyahu's enduring popularity, particularly in a nation fixated on security, stems from his promotion of cynicism. Instead of fostering hope and risking disappointment, cynicism allows supporters to view events with derision, believing they understand the "real" workings of the world. Netanyahu is portrayed as a skilled guide, showing his followers the "backstage" of politics, turning perceived flaws into sources of admiration.
His strategy involves embracing the gap between his words and actions, with supporters proudly calling him a magician or manipulator. He avoids presenting a clear vision for the future, with his Likud party not publishing a platform since 2013. This approach allows individuals with conflicting ideologies to feel he can achieve their goals, offering a sense of security even after failures he may have contributed to.
Ultimately, the article posits that cynicism offers temporary strength but long-term weakness, preventing genuine security or comfort and hindering the possibility of change. It warns that even opponents of Netanyahu can fall prey to this cynicism, adopting a resigned attitude. The author concludes that the upcoming election's significant battle will be over voter turnout, emphasizing the need to convince people to overcome cynicism and believe in the possibility of change, even without guaranteed victory.
