Israeli Player Anan Khalaili's Goal Approved Despite Handball Controversy
Translated & summarized from N12 by baba
Crystal Palace's 3-1 win over Nottingham Forest included a controversial goal where the ball hit Israeli player Anan Khalaili's elbow before scoring. Former linesman Darren Cann explained that VAR upheld the on-field decision due to lack of immediate, clear evidence of handball. Nottingham Forest fans criticized the referee and VAR for inconsistency, comparing it to a previous handball decision against their team.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Anan Khalaili's goal for Crystal Palace was allowed despite appearing to hit his elbow.
- Former linesman Darren Cann explained VAR protocol requires clear evidence to overturn on-field calls.
- Nottingham Forest fans strongly criticized the referee and VAR for the decision.
- The controversy was compared to a previous handball call against Nottingham Forest.
- Crystal Palace came back from a 1-0 deficit to win 3-1.
Crystal Palace secured a 3-1 victory over Nottingham Forest on Sunday, with the second goal for Palace sparking debate. The goal was scored after the ball struck Israeli player Anan Khalaili's elbow, yet it was allowed to stand. English football commentators and fans have been discussing the incident, with former international linesman Darren Cann explaining the decision to the BBC. Cann noted that replays suggested the ball did hit Khalaili's hand before entering the net after a header from Jefferson Lerma. However, he emphasized that VAR officials cannot spend excessive time on such reviews, and if there is no clear and obvious evidence immediately available, they must uphold the on-field referee's decision.
Fans of Nottingham Forest expressed strong criticism of the referee, Peter Banks, and the VAR team, citing the decision as another instance where their team was on the wrong side of a controversial VAR call. They drew a parallel to an earlier season incident where Nico Williams' goal was disallowed for handball after a six-minute VAR review. The Forest fans argued that Khalaili's situation warranted a different outcome and voiced frustration over perceived inconsistency in refereeing decisions.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 2
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
