Israeli Player Anan Khalaili's Goal Allowed Despite Handball Controversy
Translated & summarized from Mako by baba
Crystal Palace's 3-1 win over Nottingham Forest included a controversial goal by Israeli player Anan Khalaili, which was allowed despite a potential handball. Former official Darren Cann explained that VAR requires clear evidence to overturn on-field decisions, and the lack of immediate certainty led to the goal standing. Nottingham Forest fans criticized the decision, citing inconsistency with previous VAR calls.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Anan Khalaili's controversial goal for Crystal Palace was allowed despite a potential handball.
- Former official Darren Cann cited VAR rules requiring clear evidence to overturn decisions.
- Nottingham Forest fans criticized the referee and VAR for perceived inconsistency.
- Crystal Palace came back from a 1-0 deficit to win 3-1.
- The incident drew comparisons to a previous disallowed goal for Nottingham Forest.
Crystal Palace secured a 3-1 victory over Nottingham Forest on Sunday, with the second goal for Palace, scored by Israeli player Anan Khalaili, sparking controversy. The goal was allowed to stand despite replays suggesting the ball may have struck Khalaili's elbow before entering the net.
Former international linesman Darren Cann, who officiated at a World Cup final, explained on the BBC that while replays indicated a handball by Khalaili after a header from Jefferson Lerma, the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) protocol requires clear and obvious evidence to overturn an on-field decision. Cann stated that if such definitive proof isn't immediately available, the original call must be upheld.
Fans of Nottingham Forest expressed strong criticism of the referee, Peter Bankes, and the VAR team, citing the decision as another instance where their team was on the wrong side of a controversial VAR call. They drew a comparison to an earlier season incident where a goal by Nico Williams was disallowed for handball after a lengthy review, arguing for greater consistency in officiating.
Despite the debate, the goal was ultimately validated, contributing to Crystal Palace's comeback win.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 2
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
