VAR Controversy: Israeli Player Anan Khalaily's Goal Stands Despite Handball
Translated & summarized from Walla by baba
Crystal Palace's 3-1 win over Nottingham Forest was marred by controversy over a goal that appeared to hit Israeli player Anan Khalaily's elbow. Despite the handball rule, the goal was allowed to stand, sparking criticism from Nottingham Forest fans and media. Former official Darren Cann explained that VAR must rely on immediate, clear evidence, but fans rejected this reasoning. Nottingham Forest manager Oliver Glasner accepted the decision, emphasizing a high threshold for VAR intervention.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Crystal Palace's 3-1 win over Nottingham Forest included a controversial goal involving Israeli player Anan Khalaily.
- Replays showed the ball struck Khalaily's elbow before entering the net, a potential handball offense.
- Nottingham Forest fans heavily criticized the referee and VAR for allowing the goal.
- Former official Darren Cann explained VAR's reliance on immediate, clear evidence.
- Nottingham Forest manager Oliver Glasner accepted the decision, calling for a high VAR intervention threshold.
A controversial second goal scored by Crystal Palace in their 3-1 victory over Nottingham Forest has sparked debate in England, centering on Israeli player Anan Khalaily. The goal, initially credited to Jefferson Lerma, was confirmed after replays showed the ball struck Khalaily's elbow before entering the net. According to the laws of the game, a goal scored directly with an attacker's hand or arm should be disallowed, even if unintentional.
Nottingham Forest's fan website heavily criticized the decision by referee Peter Bankes and the VAR team, drawing parallels to an earlier season incident where a goal for Neco Williams was disallowed for a handball after a lengthy review. The fans expressed frustration over perceived inconsistency in officiating, arguing that Khalaily's case warranted a different outcome.
Former international linesman Darren Cann offered an explanation to the BBC, suggesting that while the ball did appear to hit Khalaily's arm, VAR officials cannot spend excessive time deliberating. He stated that if clear and unequivocal evidence is not immediately available, the on-field decision should stand. This explanation was dismissed by the fan website as "ridiculous," emphasizing that the duration of the review should not determine the validity of a goal.
Surprisingly, Nottingham Forest manager Oliver Glasner, returning to his former club's ground, refrained from criticizing the officials. He noted that the threshold for VAR intervention should be very high, referencing a previous disallowed goal for his team. Glasner accepted the decision, stating that while some borderline calls didn't favor his team, it's a test of their ability to remain calm and focused. He also thanked Crystal Palace fans for their warm reception and expressed regret for the loss, despite his team creating numerous chances.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 2
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.