Wire

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Ongoing Story· Day 2

Israeli Supreme Court Rules Lenders Must Compensate Buyers for Delayed Apartment Deliveries

2 developments

BizportalPolitics

Israeli Supreme Court Rules Lenders Must Compensate Buyers for Delayed Apartment Deliveries

Translated & summarized from Bizportal by baba

BusinessNeutral tone

Hebrew · Sole source

Israel's Supreme Court ruled that financial lenders taking over real estate projects must compensate apartment buyers for delivery delays from the date their receiver is appointed. Justice Ruth Ronen stated that lenders stepping into the developer's role are partially liable for delays occurring during the receivership. This decision partially accepted an appeal by Bat Yam apartment buyers, ordering a re-evaluation of their compensation claim. The ruling aims to incentivize faster project completion by receivers.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Israeli Supreme Court ruled financial lenders must compensate buyers for apartment delivery delays after project takeover.
  • Compensation applies from the date the lender's receiver is appointed, not for earlier delays.
  • Justice Ruth Ronen stated lenders taking over projects are partially liable for delays during receivership.
  • The ruling partially accepted an appeal by Bat Yam apartment buyers.
  • The decision aims to incentivize receivers to complete construction and deliver apartments promptly.

The Israeli Supreme Court has ruled that a financial lender who takes over a real estate project after the developer's collapse must compensate apartment buyers for delays in delivery, starting from the date the lender's receiver was appointed. However, the lender is not obligated to compensate for delays that occurred between the initial delay and the receiver's appointment. This landmark decision was delivered by Supreme Court Justice Ruth Ronen.

Justice Ronen addressed the central question of whether a lending bank, which chooses to complete a project through its own receiver instead of enforcing sales law guarantees, is bound by the original sales agreements made between the buyers and the developer. Buyers argued that the lender, acting through its receiver, inherits all the developer's obligations, including compensation for late delivery. The Supervisor of Insolvency largely agreed, but limited this obligation to debts incurred after the receivership proceedings began.

The lender and its receiver contended that as a secured creditor, the bank has priority over the buyers. They argued that even when completing a project, they do not step into the developer's shoes regarding pre-existing agreements and therefore should not be liable for delays. They also warned that holding lenders liable for such delays could increase the cost of project financing, ultimately burdening future homebuyers.

Justice Ronen determined that when a lender takes over a project and steps into the developer's role, its rights are subordinate to the buyers' right to compensation for delivery delays during the receivership period. This ruling applies only to the period after the receivership proceedings commenced. She explained that this creates an incentive for the receiver to complete construction and deliver apartments as quickly as possible, as ongoing delays incur new monthly compensation obligations.

The ruling partially accepted an appeal by apartment buyers in a Bat Yam building where a Tama 38 renovation project was undertaken. The financial backing was provided by Ayalon Insurance Company, with Adv. Hagai Ullman appointed as receiver. The Tel Aviv District Court had previously dismissed the buyers' compensation claim, but Justice Ronen ordered a re-evaluation based on her new principles. Deputy President Noam Sohlberg agreed with the ruling but expressed reservations about the possibility of parties reaching agreements where buyers waive some of their rights. Justice Yael Vilner concurred with Ronen's main decision.

BizportalOther · Tel Aviv

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Open the Wire