Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

N12Politics

Supreme Court Overturns Election Committee, Bans Sharing Voter Information

Translated & summarized from N12 by baba

CenterNeutral tone

Hebrew · 23 newsrooms covering

Israel's Supreme Court has canceled a Central Elections Committee decision, prohibiting the real-time sharing of information about who has voted. The court cited privacy concerns and a lack of legal authority for the practice.

The story in 4 lines · by baba

  • Supreme Court bans sharing voter information on election day.
  • Court cites privacy violations and lack of legal basis.
  • Decision overturns Central Elections Committee's prior approval.
  • Ruling impacts parties' ability to track voter turnout.
Supreme Court Overturns Election Committee, Bans Sharing Voter Information
Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

Israel's Supreme Court on Thursday overturned a decision by the Central Elections Committee, ruling that information about citizens who have voted cannot be shared in real-time on election day. The court determined that this practice, which had been ongoing, infringes upon the right to privacy and violates the Privacy Protection Law.

In its ruling, authored by Justice Yael Vilner and joined by Justices Alex Stein and Khaled Kabub, the court stated there was no legal basis for the Elections Committee to permit the transfer of voter data to party representatives at polling stations. The judges emphasized that even a long-standing practice cannot substitute for explicit legal authorization.

"The information regarding the exercise of the right to vote is information about a person's political views, perceptions, or worldview, and therefore it is considered 'information of special sensitivity,'" the ruling stated. "Already in the very choice of a person to come or refrain from coming to the polling station to exercise their right to vote lies a value decision."

This decision comes after the Central Elections Committee, which has a coalition majority, had previously rejected a ruling by Judge Noam Solberg that would have prohibited the use of reporting systems from polling stations. The committee had allowed parties to report on voters using applications like "Elector."

MK Simcha Rothman commented on the ruling, suggesting that searching one's phone is less of a privacy violation than the established practice of reporting voter turnout. Attorney Ilan Bombach, representing the Likud party, argued that the ban on sharing voter names would cause "enormous damage" to the party, hindering its ability to utilize its voter database.

N12Centre · Neve Ilan

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 28 outlets
First: Channel 13 · Sep 17

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Open the Wire