Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

YnetPolitics

Supreme Court Bans Election App Tracking Non-Voters

Translated & summarized from Ynet by baba

CenterNeutral tone

Hebrew · 23 newsrooms covering

Israel's Supreme Court has banned the use of the 'Elector' app, which tracked non-voters for political parties during elections. The court ruled that the app could lead to voter intimidation and privacy violations, overturning a previous approval by the Central Elections Committee.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Supreme Court bans 'Elector' app tracking non-voters.
  • App allowed real-time reporting to parties on non-voters.
  • Court cited potential voter intimidation and privacy concerns.
  • Ruling overturns Central Elections Committee approval.
  • App's misuse potential deemed to outweigh party benefits.
Supreme Court Bans Election App Tracking Non-Voters
Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

Israel's Supreme Court has prohibited the use of the 'Elector' application, which allowed political parties to receive real-time reports during elections about citizens who had not yet voted. This ruling overturns a decision made earlier this month by the Central Elections Committee, which had approved the app's use by a vote of 19 to 11.

The court's decision, delivered by Justice Yael Willner, stated that the app's functionality could lead to voter intimidation and potentially infringe upon the right to privacy. The court emphasized that the purpose of election day is for citizens to vote freely, and the app's ability to track non-voters could create undue pressure.

Justice Willner noted that while the Central Elections Committee is responsible for overseeing election procedures, the Supreme Court has the authority to intervene when fundamental rights are at stake. The court found that the app's potential for misuse outweighed any perceived benefit to political parties in monitoring voter turnout. The ruling means that parties will not be able to use this specific method to identify and contact potential voters who have not yet cast their ballots on election day.

YnetCentre · Rishon LeZion

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 28 outlets
First: Channel 13 · Sep 17

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Open the Wire