Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

MakoWorld

New York Times Issues Correction After Outcry Over October 7 Victimhood Remark

Translated & summarized from Mako by baba

CenterCharged tone

Hebrew · 10 newsrooms covering

The New York Times removed a sentence from an article that stated Israelis "still see themselves as the victims of October 7," after facing widespread criticism and accusations of bias. The newspaper attributed the remark to an "editing error" and issued a clarification, which was met with further criticism from Israeli officials.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • New York Times removed a sentence about Israelis viewing themselves as October 7 victims.
  • The newspaper cited an "editing error" for the controversial phrasing.
  • The removal followed significant online backlash and accusations of anti-Israel bias.
  • An Israeli embassy spokesperson criticized the clarification as an "unmasked" bias.
  • The Times has faced prior accusations of biased coverage regarding the Gaza war.
New York Times Issues Correction After Outcry Over October 7 Victimhood Remark
Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

The New York Times issued a clarification and removed a sentence from an article that sparked outrage online, with critics accusing the newspaper of bias against Israel. The sentence in question stated that Israelis "still see themselves as the victims of October 7." This phrasing was interpreted by many as questioning Israel's victimhood status following the Hamas attacks.

The article, which focused on the Israeli reaction to the documentary "Nezah," initially read, "Israelis are deeply divided among themselves on how to assign responsibility for the political, military and intelligence failures that preceded the attack and the war. But most Israelis still see themselves as the victims of October 7." The controversy intensified on social media, with Israeli figures condemning the newspaper.

In response to the backlash, the New York Times posted a clarification on X (formerly Twitter) and at the bottom of the article. They attributed the problematic phrasing to an "editing error," stating that the sentence was intended to describe Israelis' perception of the government's response to the attack, but it mistakenly implied that their experience as terror victims was a matter of perception. The newspaper confirmed the sentence had been removed from the article.

Tal Naim, spokesperson for the Israeli Embassy in Washington, criticized the clarification, calling it a "bare and unmasked version of the stance you have expressed towards the State of Israel over the past three years." She added that the newspaper's attempt to hide behind professional jargon would not erase what was revealed, and that the paper had not apologized for the original wording or addressed the underlying bias.

The New York Times has faced frequent accusations of anti-Israel bias in its coverage since the start of the war. A recent Yale University study claimed the paper's early coverage of the Gaza war exhibited clear bias against Israel by downplaying the severity of its losses and minimizing Hamas's role. Israel has also announced plans to sue the newspaper for libel over a separate article that included allegations of sexual assault by Israeli forces and settlers, which Israel has called "one of the most horrific and distorted lies ever against the State of Israel."

MakoCentre · Neve Ilan

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

WorldTopic

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Open the Wire