Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

KipaSecurity

IDF Responds to Controversial Gaza War Film 'Accidental Damage'

Translated & summarized from Kipa by baba

Religious-rightNeutral tone

Hebrew · 23 newsrooms covering

The IDF has responded to the controversy surrounding the documentary "Accidental Damage," which alleges misconduct in Gaza. The military denies claims about AI decision-making and civilian harm, stating all strike approvals are human-led and operations follow international law.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • IDF denies film's claims on AI targeting and civilian harm in Gaza.
  • Military questions anonymity and relevance of soldier testimonies.
  • IDF states strike decisions are made solely by humans.
  • Film creators aim for wide distribution in Israel.
  • Israeli minister threatened to revoke creators' citizenship.
IDF Responds to Controversial Gaza War Film 'Accidental Damage'
Editorial illustration generated by baba News, not a photograph of the event.

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) issued its first official response to the controversy surrounding the documentary film "Accidental Damage" (Nezak Agavi), which premiered at the Venice Film Festival and presents allegations regarding the IDF's conduct in the Gaza Strip, target selection, and civilian casualties.

The film, created by Israelis Yuval Avraham and Rachel Shore in collaboration with The Guardian newspaper, is based on testimonies from 24 Israeli soldiers and intelligence officers who allegedly served in Gaza during the war. In its statement, the IDF claimed that the anonymous nature of these testimonies makes it impossible to verify the identities or service details of the interviewees. The military also asserted that some claims in the film pertain to national and military strategy, which would be beyond the knowledge of junior-ranking soldiers. Furthermore, the IDF stated that the film incorrectly uses legal terminology and contains internal contradictions, with some alleged interviewees not being involved in the matters discussed due to their roles.

A central claim in the film concerns the use of artificial intelligence in strike decisions. The IDF vehemently denied this, clarifying that automated systems do not make independent decisions. "Decisions regarding the selection and approval of strikes in the IDF are made solely by human personnel," the statement read, emphasizing that operations adhere to military directives, not AI.

The IDF also rejected accusations that unintentional harm to civilians resulting from lawful strikes was deliberate or constituted 'genocide.' The military stressed that its operations in Gaza are defensive, aimed at targeting terror organizations like Hamas in accordance with international law while striving to minimize civilian harm. The IDF highlighted its internal enforcement mechanisms for investigating alleged violations and prosecuting offenders, noting that soldiers are obligated to report any suspected illegal activity.

The film sparked significant backlash in Israel, with Culture and Sports Minister Miki Zohar condemning it as "despicable" and vowing to seek the revocation of the creators' Israeli citizenship. Yuval Avraham, one of the filmmakers, urged the Israeli public to watch the film before judging it, emphasizing the importance of the soldiers' testimonies and expressing a commitment to wide distribution within Israel.

KipaRight · Jerusalem

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 26 outlets
First: Mako · Sep 12

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Related stories · 2

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the Wire