Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

BizportalGeneral

Passenger Wins Compensation After Bus Company Repeatedly Ignores Stops

Translated & summarized from Bizportal by baba

BusinessNeutral tone

Hebrew · 4 newsrooms covering

An Israeli passenger was awarded 3,000 shekels after a bus company repeatedly failed to stop for him. The court found the company liable for the repeated violations, citing evidence and regulatory authority involvement.

The story in 5 lines · by baba

  • Passenger awarded 3,000 shekels after bus company repeatedly ignored him.
  • Court found bus company liable for multiple instances of failing to stop.
  • Passenger documented seven incidents and filed complaints with transport authority.
  • Bus company's defenses, including bad faith and failure to mitigate damages, were rejected.
  • Compensation covers distress, inconvenience, and wasted time, not proven financial loss.

A regular public transport user in Israel has been awarded 3,000 shekels (approximately $800 USD) in compensation after a bus company repeatedly failed to stop for him at his designated bus stop. Meir Cohen, who commutes to work in Petah Tikva four times a week, testified that over a three-month period, the drivers of Dan bus line 82 ignored his signals to stop at the Zhabotinsky/HaYetzira station at least ten times. Cohen documented seven of these instances by photographing the license plates of the buses that passed him by. He also filed seven complaints with the National Public Transport Authority, which he claims only received automated responses. The authority did investigate some of his complaints, cross-referencing them with the bus operator's performance data. For one incident on May 13, the authority informed Cohen that the case would be transferred to administrative enforcement proceedings. The court considered these responses from the regulatory body as objective support for Cohen's claims, noting that they were based on the operator's data and issued after an inspection. The judge emphasized that the repeated nature of the incidents further strengthened the plaintiff's case. Dan argued that Cohen had not proven he was at the station for each incident, lacked additional witnesses, and acted in bad faith by contacting the Ministry of Transport instead of the company directly, aiming to accumulate complaints for financial gain. The court dismissed these arguments, finding no basis for them and stating there was nothing wrong with a passenger contacting the supervisory authority. Dan also claimed Cohen failed to mitigate his damages by not taking a taxi, but the court ruled that passengers are not obligated to immediately incur taxi costs when a bus fails to stop. The court cited traffic regulations obligating bus operators to run services regularly and drivers to stop for waiting passengers. While the court accepted Cohen's claims of violations, it did not award the full 30,000 shekels he sought, stating the compensation should not function as a fine and that Cohen had not proven financial damages. However, the judge acknowledged that being passed by a bus causes inconvenience, lost time, and disruption, especially when it occurs repeatedly. Considering the documented incidents, the regulatory authority's involvement, and Cohen's testimony of waiting an additional 20 minutes for each missed bus, the court awarded him 3,000 shekels for distress, inconvenience, and wasted time. Dan will also reimburse Cohen for his 300 shekel court filing fee.

BizportalOther · Tel Aviv

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Full coverage · 5 outlets
First: Bizportal · Sep 11

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Related stories · 1

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the Wire