Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Welcome — one more step

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Ask Duki without the monthly limit — answers from the coverage, with sources
  • Save articles, synced between the web and the app
  • Every Not Everywhere story, no daily limit
  • How each newsroom worded the same event
  • Filing timeline and coverage breakdown
  • The whole archive, searchable
  • Unlimited newsroom, topic and people follows
  • The daily brief by email, in English or Hebrew

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

to move · to open · esc to close

Live Terminal

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Keep the whole picture

News Plus opens the cross-newsroom layer — who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it.

  • Ask Duki without the monthly limit — answers from the coverage, with sources
  • Save articles, synced between the web and the app
  • Every Not Everywhere story, no daily limit
  • How each newsroom worded the same event
  • Filing timeline and coverage breakdown
  • The whole archive, searchable
  • Unlimited newsroom, topic and people follows
  • The daily brief by email, in English or Hebrew

Eligible new subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 each year. Renews automatically until cancelled. Cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms.

Your subscription also unlocks the app.

Compare full coverage across 5 outlets

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to save this article and find it on your phone.

or use an email code

AnalysisBy עקיבא ביגמן, https://www.facebook.com/akiva.bigman
Politics15:32 · 56m ago

Netanyahu's 'Armored Placements' in Likud List Criticized as Ineffective

MidaRight
Translated & summarized from Mida by baba
The story · English

The Likud party's internal debate over "armored placements", reserved spots on the electoral list, has concluded, with the author criticizing the final lineup ahead of the elections. The author argues that while the individuals chosen are often personally respectable, the placements fail to serve their intended purposes.

Traditionally, these reserved spots are meant to either inject experienced figures with policy expertise into the party or bring in "electoral stars" to boost the campaign and appeal to new demographics. The author contends that Netanyahu's current selections achieve neither goal. Few possess significant experience in legislation, policy-making, or public administration, and their national public profiles are generally low, limiting their campaign impact, with the exception of Yaakov Bardugo.

The article contrasts these placements with past examples, like sports stars such as Eli Ohana or Tal Brody, who, while not ideal, at least represented national symbols with potential political weight. The current selections are seen as lacking even that potential.

Furthermore, the author dismisses the idea that these placements are strategic responses to political arguments, such as adding a hostage's mother to counter protests or a wounded soldier to counter reservist activism. The piece argues that an electoral list is not a messaging tool, and candidates should not be used to score political points in identity politics.

The author also highlights the negative consequences of these placements, primarily that they displace qualified candidates chosen through the Likud's democratic primary process. This, the article states, weakens the party by pushing aside potentially strong contenders and benefits party insiders. The author suggests that the large number of placements this time was particularly problematic, requiring Netanyahu to make deals with certain party factions, which ultimately may have harmed the primary process itself.

Read the original at Mida
Full coverage · 5 outlets
50% centerFirst: Hamal · 10h ago

The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.

Center 2Right 2Unrated 1
Related stories · 5

Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.

Open the live terminal