Jerusalem Court Orders Husband to Share Hidden Luxury Penthouse in Divorce Settlement
Translated & summarized from N12 by baba
A Jerusalem court upheld a prenuptial agreement but ordered a husband to share a concealed luxury penthouse with his wife after she proved he hid the asset during their marriage. The husband’s claim that the penthouse was a gift from his parents was rejected due to contradictory evidence and their refusal to testify. He must pay half the penthouse’s value plus legal fees.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Jerusalem court upheld prenuptial agreement but ordered husband to share hidden penthouse with wife.
- Wife alleged husband hid $400,000 bank account, warehouse, cottage, and penthouse; most claims rejected.
- Husband admitted hiding penthouse, claimed it was a gift from parents, court rejected this claim.
- Evidence included recordings and parents’ refusal to testify, raising suspicion about gift claim.
- Husband must pay wife half penthouse value as of March 2018 plus interest and 40,000 shekels in legal fees.
- Court emphasized prenuptial agreements are hard to annul but don’t protect undisclosed assets.
A Jerusalem Family Court recently ruled against a wife’s request to annul a prenuptial agreement but ordered her husband to compensate her for a luxury penthouse he concealed during their marriage. The couple married in late 2003 and signed a prenuptial agreement in March 2018 establishing full separation of assets. In July 2019, the wife filed to cancel the agreement, alleging her husband misrepresented his business status, hid a US bank account with nearly $400,000, a warehouse, a cottage, and a penthouse, and acted in bad faith.
Judge Moshe Brown rejected most of her claims, noting the high legal standard required to overturn a court-approved prenuptial agreement. The wife’s own statements during the agreement’s approval undermined her claims about the husband’s business debts and concealed assets. Evidence showed she was aware of the US bank account before signing the agreement. Claims about the warehouse and cottage were also dismissed due to insufficient proof of concealment.
However, the court accepted the wife’s claim regarding the penthouse in Jerusalem, valued between 3.5 and 4.5 million shekels. The husband admitted to hiding the property but argued it was a gift from his parents and thus exempt from division. The court rejected this, citing contradictory evidence including a recording of the husband acknowledging payment for the property and the parents’ refusal to testify, which raised suspicion. The judge ruled the gift claim did not reflect reality.
Ultimately, the prenuptial agreement remains valid, but the husband must pay the wife half the penthouse’s value as of March 15, 2018, plus interest and legal fees totaling 40,000 shekels. The ruling highlights that court-approved prenuptial agreements are difficult to annul but do not protect undisclosed assets. Concealing property under a false gift claim can lead to costly legal consequences.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 1Haredi 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.