Full coverage · Politics · Updated 27 Aug, 15:59
Israeli Court Sets Precedent by Canceling Prenuptial Agreement Exploiting Husband's Vulnerability An Israeli family court invalidated a decade-old prenuptial agreement after ruling that a Haredi husband was exploited due to extreme dependence on his wife, leaving him financially destitute. The decision sets a legal precedent against enforcing unfair agreements signed under psychological pressure.
2 newsrooms · 1 language · since 26 Aug, 18:07 Follow Story PlusContinue with Apple Continue with Google or use an email code
By continuing you agree to the terms and privacy policy .
News Plus · Alerts
Choose the alerts that matter to you News Plus adds alerts in the app for the topics, people and stories you follow.
A topic you follow In the app A story you follow In the app Also in News Plus
Unlimited follows What changed since you read it The daily brief by email Who reported firstSee all 15 in News Plus Choose a plan
Annual 7 days free $34.99 a year $2.92 a month · save 41% Monthly $4.99 a month
Start 7 days free New subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 a year. Renews automatically until you cancel; cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms
Continue with Apple Continue with Google or use an email code
By continuing you agree to the terms and privacy policy .
What happened 01 Israeli court annulled a prenuptial agreement exploiting a husband's extreme dependence. 02 The couple, married 28 years with four children, owned two apartments funded partly by husband's family. 03 Agreement transferred full property rights to wife, leaving husband financially vulnerable. 04 Judge ruled husband signed under anxiety without legal advice or fair negotiation. 05 Wife misled husband, presenting agreement as non-binding protective measure. 06 Court criticized prior superficial approval, highlighting husband's total dependence. Translated and summarized by baba from Kikar HaShabbat , the latest report. Read Kikar HaShabbat’s original The coverage
2 newsrooms on this story Who covered it Left None Centre 1 Right None Haredi 1 Arab None First filed by a newsroom, then the rest
See who broke it News Plus · Who reported first
See which newsroom broke it The order the newsrooms filed in, and how long each side of the press waited before running the story.
First to file: locked Then the rest, in order
Also in News Plus
Headlines side by side Story alerts The Wire Unlimited followsSee all 15 in News Plus Choose a plan
Annual 7 days free $34.99 a year $2.92 a month · save 41% Monthly $4.99 a month
Start 7 days free New subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 a year. Renews automatically until you cancel; cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms