Full coverage · Politics · Updated 12 Aug, 23:00
Israeli Supreme Court Declines to Intervene in Likud Party Dispute Over Candidate Eligibility The Israeli Supreme Court declined to intervene in a Likud party dispute over whether sitting Knesset members can run for reserved district seats, upholding the party tribunal's decision to restrict such candidacies to the national list unless officials resign. The court urged internal resolution and dismissed the petition after signaling its intent to reject it.
7 newsrooms · 1 language · since 12 Aug, 10:30 Follow Story PlusContinue with Apple Continue with Google or use an email code
By continuing you agree to the terms and privacy policy .
News Plus · Alerts
Choose the alerts that matter to you News Plus adds alerts in the app for the topics, people and stories you follow.
A topic you follow In the app A story you follow In the app Also in News Plus
Unlimited follows What changed since you read it The daily brief by email Who reported firstSee all 15 in News Plus Choose a plan
Annual 7 days free $34.99 a year $2.92 a month · save 41% Monthly $4.99 a month
Start 7 days free New subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 a year. Renews automatically until you cancel; cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms
Continue with Apple Continue with Google or use an email code
By continuing you agree to the terms and privacy policy .
Illustration by baba What happened 01 Supreme Court rejects petition challenging Likud tribunal's decision on candidate eligibility. 02 Likud tribunal annulled vote allowing sitting officials to run for reserved district seats. 03 Sitting Knesset members must resign to compete for district slots, per tribunal ruling. 04 Justices urged resolving the dispute internally, criticizing court involvement. 05 District court previously declined to intervene in the party's internal dispute. 06 Decision maintains separation between national list and district representation slots. Translated and summarized by baba from Walla , the latest report. Read Walla’s original The coverage
7 newsrooms on this story Who covered it Left None Centre 4 Right 2 Haredi 1 Arab None See who broke it News Plus · Who reported first
See which newsroom broke it The order the newsrooms filed in, and how long each side of the press waited before running the story.
First to file: locked Then the rest, in order
Also in News Plus
Headlines side by side Story alerts The Live Terminal Unlimited followsSee all 15 in News Plus Choose a plan
Annual 7 days free $34.99 a year $2.92 a month · save 41% Monthly $4.99 a month
Start 7 days free New subscribers get 7 days free, then $34.99 a year. Renews automatically until you cancel; cancel any time in your account. Subscription terms