Wire

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

News Plus

Welcome, one more step

The cross-newsroom layer: who covered a story, who didn’t, and how each one worded it. Plus your own news, on every device.

Follow your news

  • Unlimited follows
  • Alerts for what you follow (in the app)
  • Story alerts (in the app)
  • Hide read stories
  • The daily brief by email

See the coverage

  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • Every newsroom clip, from every platform
  • Every newsroom photo on a story

Go deeper

  • The whole archive
  • Your reading diet
  • Duki without the daily limit
  • The Desk: the news, spoken every hour
  • Catch Me Up, and what changed since you read it
  • The Wire

Free stays free: the live wire, Not Everywhere, the brief, five follows and five Duki questions a day.

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

News Plus · Ask Duki

Keep asking Duki

A free account gets five questions a day. News Plus lifts the daily limit.

Also in News Plus

  • The whole archive
  • Headlines side by side
  • Who reported first
  • The Desk, every hour

Full coverage· General· Updated

Court Rules Brother Who Held Haifa Duplex for 27 Years Can Keep It

An Israeli court has ruled that a brother who has possessed a duplex apartment in Haifa for 27 years can keep it, rejecting his sibling's appeal.

2 newsrooms · 1 language · since

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to save this article and find it on your phone.

or use an email code

What happened

  1. 01A brother who held a Haifa duplex for 27 years won his appeal, retaining ownership.
  2. 02The court ruled the signature on the sales agreement was authentic, despite an incorrect date.
  3. 03The plaintiff brother had previously failed to declare the duplex during bankruptcy proceedings.
  4. 04The judges noted a serious error by the lawyer in dating the sales agreement.
  5. 05The ruling orders the plaintiff brother to pay 15,000 shekels in legal expenses.

The court found the signature on the sales agreement to be authentic, though dated incorrectly, and noted the plaintiff had previously failed to declare the property during bankruptcy proceedings. The ruling upholds a prior decision and orders the plaintiff to pay legal costs.

Translated and summarized by baba from N12, the latest report. Read N12’s original

The coverage

2 newsrooms on this story

Who covered it

  • LeftNone
  • Centre1
  • RightNone
  • HarediNone
  • ArabNone
  • Other1

How it broke

Plus

News Plus · Who reported first

See which newsroom broke it

The order the newsrooms filed in, and how long each side of the press waited before running the story.

Also in News Plus

  • Headlines side by side
  • Story alerts
  • The Wire
  • Unlimited follows

How it reads

Neutral tone, on average across the newsrooms

How temperature and stance are measured