Israeli Political Debate Returns to Old Rivalries Despite Calls for Post-October Reset
After the October 7 crisis, Israeli political leaders promised a reset but quickly reverted to old rivalries ahead of upcoming elections. Professor Moshe Cohen-Eliya argues Israel needs a new right-wing liberal party focused on a clear national vision rather than leadership disputes. He highlights the gap between Israel’s changing social fabric and its institutional power, calling for a new elite that balances tradition with modern liberal values. The future political order must emerge from foundational ideas, not personal ambitions.
הידיעה ב-6 שורות · תקציר של baba
- Israeli leaders promised a post-October 7 reset but returned to old political rivalries.
- Professor Moshe Cohen-Eliya calls for a right-wing liberal party with a clear national vision.
- He highlights a gap between Israel’s social changes and institutional power structures.
- Independent institutions must respect popular sovereignty in democratic governance.
- The new political elite should blend tradition with liberal, forward-looking values.
- The upcoming elections should focus on foundational change, not personal ambitions.
Following the traumatic events of October 7, 2026, there was widespread agreement on the need for a fundamental reset in Israel’s political and institutional landscape. The failures exposed were not just individual mistakes but revealed deep systemic weaknesses in governance, accountability, and decision-making frameworks. However, as the next elections approach, political discourse has reverted to familiar conflicts over leadership positions and party rankings rather than addressing the core issues that necessitated change.
Professor Moshe Cohen-Eliya, founder of the research institute "Masad Ha'aretz," criticizes the current political scene for lacking new ideas or visions for the country’s future. He argues that a genuine reset must begin with a clear vision of the kind of state Israel wants to build, rather than focusing on who will lead or hold ministerial portfolios. Cohen-Eliya sees a real need for a single right-wing liberal party that combines security and nationalism with liberal values such as personal freedom, economic competitiveness, science, technology, and equal opportunity.
He highlights the historical context of Israel’s institutional power, noting that although the Labor movement shaped the state’s institutions for decades, demographic and cultural shifts have changed the country’s social fabric. Yet, institutional power structures have not adapted at the same pace, creating a constitutional and political crisis marked by a gap between Israel’s social structure and its centers of power.
Cohen-Eliya stresses that while independent institutions like the judiciary and academia are vital to democracy, they should not override popular sovereignty. The transition of hegemonic power should not be about revenge or elite replacement but about forming a new elite that is rooted in tradition yet forward-looking, national yet liberal, and committed to both popular sovereignty and professional integrity.
Invoking Herzl’s vision of "Altneuland" (Old-New Land), Cohen-Eliya calls for integrating Israel’s historical identity with modern values such as freedom, equality, and technological advancement. He concludes that the critical question is not just who wins the upcoming elections but what political and social order will emerge from the recent crisis. Israel needs a new leadership that starts with a foundational idea rather than personal ambitions, emphasizing the need to start anew from the beginning rather than merely restarting.
מוזכרים
אותו אירוע, כפי שכל מערכת דיווחה עליו בנפרד. פתחו כמה דיווחים כדי להשוות מה כל מערכת מדגישה, ומה היא משאירה בחוץ.
מרכז 2
לא אותו אירוע: ידיעות אחרות שחולקות עם הידיעה הזו אנשים, מקומות או נושא. רקע, תגובות והמשכים.
