Former AG Mandelblit's Testimony Causes Laughter in Netanyahu Trial
Former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit admitted in Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's trial that the initial warning issued to Netanyahu in Case 2000 was unsuitable for the suspicions investigated. His statement, "Correct, I was not aware of it," during questioning by Netanyahu's lawyer Amit Haddad, caused judges to laugh. The defense argued this showed a gap between the warning and the indictment's factual basis, while prosecutors objected to the connection.
הידיעה ב-5 שורות · תקציר של baba
- Former AG Avichai Mandelblit admitted warning wording in Netanyahu's Case 2000 was unsuitable.
- Mandelblit's statement "I was not aware of it" caused judges to laugh.
- Netanyahu's lawyer Amit Haddad highlighted the discrepancy in the warning.
- The defense claims a gap exists between the warning and the indictment's facts.
- Prosecutors objected to linking the initial warning to the final indictment.
An unusual moment occurred in the Jerusalem District Court on Sunday during the testimony of former Attorney General Avichai Mandelblit in the trial of Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Mandelblit admitted during direct examination that the wording of the warning issued to Netanyahu in Case 2000 did not align with the suspicions being investigated in the affair, a statement that subsequently drew laughter from the courtroom.
The incident unfolded after Netanyahu's lawyer, Amit Haddad, presented Mandelblit with the warning given to the Prime Minister on January 5, 2017. The warning stated that Netanyahu was suspected of unlawfully requesting and receiving favors from businessmen. However, Haddad argued that the core of the investigation in this case revolved around conversations between Netanyahu and Arnon (Noni) Mozes, owner of Yedioth Ahronoth, concerning media coverage and the distribution of the newspaper Israel Hayom.
Mandelblit responded "not suitable" when Haddad pressed him on whether the warning's wording matched the case's suspicions. When asked if he had alerted anyone to this flaw, Mandelblit replied, "Correct, I was not aware of it." These remarks prompted immediate reactions and laughter from the judges.
Haddad also pointed out that subsequent interrogations of Netanyahu in January and March 2017 did not include a revised warning, which the defense contended should have clarified the specific suspicions. The defense sought to demonstrate a discrepancy between the initial warning and the factual basis for the final indictment. Prosecution representatives objected to linking the initial warning to the final indictment, asserting that Mandelblit had already authorized the investigation into all conversations and recordings central to the case.
מוזכרים
לא אותו אירוע: ידיעות אחרות שחולקות עם הידיעה הזו אנשים, מקומות או נושא. רקע, תגובות והמשכים.