National Insurance to Pay Benefits: Landmark Ruling After 20 Years
The Regional Labor Court ruled that singer Yirmi Kaplan's 2006 stage injury is a work accident, ordering the National Insurance Institute to pay benefits. The institute had initially denied the claim, arguing Kaplan's energetic performance constituted voluntary risk-taking. The court rejected this, stating such movements are integral to his work and entitled him to a safety net. Kaplan will now receive full work accident benefits.
הידיעה ב-5 שורות · תקציר של baba
- Yirmi Kaplan's 2006 stage injury will be recognized as a work accident, with benefits to be paid by National Insurance.
- The Regional Labor Court rejected the National Insurance Institute's claim of voluntary risk-taking by the performer.
- The court ruled that energetic stage movements are integral to a live performer's job.
- Kaplan filed his claim 18 years after the incident, citing a lack of awareness of his rights.
- The ruling establishes a precedent for performers' work accident claims.
The National Insurance Institute will pay benefits to veteran singer and creator Yirmi Kaplan, following a significant legal victory. The Regional Labor Court ruled that Kaplan's injury, sustained during a 2006 performance, is to be fully recognized as a work accident. Kaplan, 65, was injured when he tripped over a guitar stand while performing in a Jerusalem bar, consistent with his energetic stage style involving constant movement and audience interaction. He suffered injuries to his neck and upper back.
The claim was filed 18 years after the incident, in 2024, with National Insurance initially rejecting it in 2025. The institute argued that Kaplan's actions, including jumping and dancing, constituted voluntary risk-taking and that a direct link between his work and the injury was not proven.
Kaplan pursued the case, presenting testimony from his production manager and guitarist. He explained that his dynamic performance style is integral to his work, aiming to enhance the audience's visual and auditory experience and foster a stronger connection. The court, presided over by Judge Tomer Silora with public representatives Aharon Konforti and Yael Peled, found Kaplan's testimony credible. They accepted his explanation for the delayed claim, attributing it to a lack of awareness of his social rights at the time.
The court criticized National Insurance's stance, ruling that energetic stage movements do not constitute "voluntary risk-taking" that forfeits rights. The judges emphasized that such actions are central to a live performer's job and that the law's purpose is to provide a safety net for all workers, without denying benefits due to "contributory fault" or perceived negligence during duty.
מוזכרים
אותו אירוע, כפי שכל מערכת דיווחה עליו בנפרד. פתחו כמה דיווחים כדי להשוות מה כל מערכת מדגישה, ומה היא משאירה בחוץ.
מרכז 1אחרים 3
לא אותו אירוע: ידיעות אחרות שחולקות עם הידיעה הזו אנשים, מקומות או נושא. רקע, תגובות והמשכים.
