Disqualification of Shas Campaign Video May Boost Party's Political Power
Translated & summarized from Arutz Sheva by baba
The Central Elections Committee disqualified a Shas campaign video featuring a Haredi soldier portrayal, a move seen as hypocritical and potentially empowering Shas politically. The article argues that election propaganda is inherently manipulative across parties and calls for more balanced regulation. It also criticizes frequent complaints by Gadi Eisenkot's party as attempts to silence opposition rather than engage democratically.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- The Central Elections Committee disqualified a Shas campaign video featuring a Haredi soldier actor.
- Shas's use of a soldier portrayal is seen as cynical given its stance on military exemptions for yeshiva students.
- Election propaganda commonly involves manipulation and partial truths across all parties.
- The disqualification may strengthen Shas by rallying support around claims of discrimination.
- Frequent complaints by Gadi Eisenkot's party are viewed as attempts to delegitimize opponents.
- The article calls for smarter, balanced regulation of election propaganda by the committee.
The Central Elections Committee recently disqualified a Shas campaign video featuring an actor portraying a Haredi soldier, sparking controversy over election propaganda standards. The video was criticized as cynical, given Shas's historical opposition to exempting yeshiva students from military service. However, the article argues that election propaganda inherently involves manipulation, partial truths, and exaggerations, and that Shas is not unique in this practice.
The committee's chairman, Judge Noam Solberg, is urged to adopt a more balanced approach, as the disqualification may ironically strengthen Shas's political influence by allowing the party to rally support around claims of discrimination against Mizrahi and Haredi communities. The article also highlights that many parties, including "Yashar!" led by Gadi Eisenkot, frequently complain about campaign videos, but such complaints often serve as attempts to delegitimize opponents rather than address genuine issues.
The piece emphasizes that election propaganda is inherently flawed and manipulative on all sides, and that the committee should avoid overreacting to minor infractions. It calls for smarter regulation that recognizes the realities of modern political campaigning, where quick, provocative messages dominate. Finally, it criticizes Eisenkot's party for filing numerous complaints, suggesting that true democracy requires responding to opponents rather than silencing them.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 1Right 3Haredi 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
