Israel Struggles to Manage Its Feral Cat Population Despite Millions Spent on Sterilization
Translated & summarized from Calcalist by baba
Israel spends millions annually on sterilizing feral cats but lacks data and coordination to reduce their population effectively. The feral cat population is estimated between 500,000 and 2 million, with no comprehensive census or clear responsibility. Experts call for a national, multi-year policy with clear roles, steady funding, and focused local actions to stabilize the population and reduce public and animal welfare burdens.
The story in 6 lines · by baba
- Israel's feral cat population is estimated between 500,000 and 2 million without a comprehensive census.
- Millions are spent yearly on sterilizations, but effectiveness in reducing populations is unknown.
- Responsibility is fragmented among ministries, local authorities, vets, and NGOs, causing uncoordinated efforts.
- Sterilization campaigns are isolated and insufficient without targeted, repeated actions in defined areas.
- A national multi-year policy with clear responsibility, funding, and data systems is needed.
- Success should be measured by population stabilization and reduced public and animal welfare burdens, not just surgery counts.
Israel faces a significant challenge in managing its feral cat population, estimated between 500,000 and 2 million cats living in public spaces. Despite spending millions of shekels annually on sterilization surgeries, the government lacks comprehensive data on the actual number of cats, their breeding hotspots, or the effectiveness of these efforts. There has never been a nationwide census or systematic mapping, and no single authority is responsible for the issue's resolution.
The current approach focuses on counting sterilization procedures as a measure of success, but this does not indicate whether the cat population is decreasing, if fewer kittens are born, or if the problem is improving. The responsibility is fragmented across government ministries, local authorities, veterinarians, and animal welfare organizations, resulting in a lack of coordinated action. Sterilization campaigns are often isolated and insufficient to stabilize populations without targeted, repeated efforts in defined areas.
This ongoing cycle leaves cats to continue reproducing, while authorities respond reactively to complaints and emergencies. The consequences extend beyond animal welfare, affecting residents who face nuisances, overburdened caregivers, animal organizations filling public service gaps, and local governments dealing with sanitation and public health issues. The article argues that this is a public management failure rather than just an animal welfare concern.
The proposed solution is a shift from sporadic campaigns to a comprehensive, multi-year national policy that clearly assigns responsibility, provides steady funding, professional standards, training, and unified data systems. Local authorities should conduct focused sterilization and mapping, alongside efforts to register and neuter pet cats, prevent abandonment, care for injured animals, regulate feeding, and manage waste sources. Success metrics should move beyond surgery counts to measuring reductions in kitten births, stabilized population centers, and decreased burdens on the public and organizations.
Yael Arkin, CEO of the "Let the Animals Live" organization, emphasizes that cats will continue living alongside humans, but Israel must decide whether to persist with improvised management or take real responsibility to solve the crisis.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 1Other 1
