Liberman Reveals He Offered Political Slots to Gilad Erdan and Others, Warns Voting for Erdan Supports Netanyahu
Avigdor Liberman, leader of the Israel Beytenu party, disclosed in a recent interview that he had offered political positions within his party to several politicians, including Gilad Erdan, Hili Tropper, and Yuli Edelstein, but was turned down by all. Liberman criticized Erdan, who recently formed a new party, stating that anyone voting for Erdan is effectively voting for Benjamin Netanyahu as prime minister.
In the interview aired on August 9, Liberman denied reports suggesting he intended to form an alliance with Yamina leader Naftali Bennett. He also dismissed rumors of conflicts among opposition leaders as "lies, fabrications, and inventions," emphasizing that they are responsible politicians focused on winning the upcoming elections and replacing the current government.
Liberman outlined his election goals, stressing the need to oust the "massacre government of October 7" and criticized the Israeli military's approach to Gaza and Lebanon, highlighting the ongoing toll of casualties without decisive victory. He expressed confidence in his strategy to form the next government without drama or personal ambition interfering.
Regarding potential coalition partners, Liberman expressed respect for Democratic Union leader Yair Golan, noting agreement on at least ten key issues, including a state commission of inquiry, universal conscription law, core curriculum education, limiting the prime minister's tenure to two terms, and establishing a constitution for Israel. He stressed the importance of focusing on shared goals rather than divisive topics like Palestinian statehood or settlement evacuations.
Liberman also mentioned recent talks with Ayelet Shaked, praising her political and private sector experience and wishing her success. His comments reflect ongoing maneuvering within the opposition ahead of the elections and his efforts to consolidate a broad coalition to challenge Netanyahu's leadership.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.