Liberman Reveals He Offered Political Slots to Gilad Erdan and Others, Warns Voting for Erdan Supports Netanyahu
Avigdor Liberman, chairman of the Israel Beiteinu party, disclosed in a recent interview that he had offered political positions within his party to several politicians, including Gilad Erdan, Hili Tropper, and Yuli Edelstein, but was declined by all. Liberman criticized Erdan, who recently formed a new party, stating that anyone voting for Erdan is effectively supporting Benjamin Netanyahu as prime minister. He urged voters to choose the "royal road" instead.
Liberman denied reports suggesting intentions to form an alliance with Naftali Bennett's party and dismissed rumors of conflicts among opposition leaders as "lies, fabrications, and inventions." He emphasized that opposition figures are responsible and united in their goal to replace the current government, which he referred to as the "massacre government of October 7." Liberman expressed frustration over ongoing security challenges, including Hezbollah violations and Hamas's strengthening, and criticized the Israel Defense Forces for considering withdrawal from Gaza and Lebanon despite years of conflict and casualties.
Regarding potential coalition partners, Liberman expressed respect for Yair Golan, leader of the Democratic Party, highlighting shared agreement on at least ten key issues such as a state commission of inquiry, universal conscription law, core curriculum education, limiting the prime minister's tenure to two terms, and establishing a constitution for Israel. He stressed the importance of pragmatic cooperation without focusing on divisive topics like Palestinian statehood or settlement evacuations.
Liberman also praised Ayelet Shaked for her political and private sector experience, wishing her success following recent discussions. He reiterated his commitment to forming a government after the upcoming elections without internal drama, focusing on victory and stability.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.