Israeli Security Officials Warn International Stabilization Force in Gaza Could Weaken IDF and Empower Hamas
Israeli security and political sources have expressed concern that the deployment of an international stabilization force in the Gaza Strip could restrict the Israel Defense Forces' (IDF) operational freedom and inadvertently strengthen Hamas. This follows the approval by Israel's political-security cabinet to grant immunity to the international force, which is set to enter specific areas of Gaza. The force, comprising around 200 personnel from friendly countries including Uganda and Morocco, is part of a 20-point plan linked to former U.S. President Donald Trump's initiative that contributed to the release of Israeli hostages.
Despite the approval, Israeli officials insist that the IDF must maintain control over the "yellow line" in Gaza and not withdraw until Hamas is fully disarmed and the territory demilitarized. Security sources argue that the international force's presence normalizes Hamas's status, allowing it to reorganize its military wing, reinforce its rule, and intimidate the Palestinian population through violence. They emphasize that only the IDF can effectively disarm Hamas and clear Gaza of weapons.
Skepticism remains about the feasibility of establishing a "green city" free of terror in Rafah under international supervision. Officials warn Hamas will continue to exert control remotely, exploit the situation for smuggling and rebuilding terror infrastructure. Military experts note that introducing multinational forces contradicts U.S. commitments to disarm Hamas before advancing reconstruction efforts, and may limit IDF's operational initiative and ability to counter terror groups in Gaza.
Israeli officials requested the U.S. to delay the international force's deployment to preserve IDF achievements, but the request was denied, with Washington proceeding according to Trump's directives. The security establishment fears the move will weaken Israel's strategic position and empower Hamas rather than diminish its influence.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
