Israeli Security Cabinet Approves Entry of US-Backed Peace Council into Gaza Despite Ben Gvir Opposition
The Israeli Security Cabinet unanimously approved the entry of the US-backed International Peace Council into the Gaza Strip on Sunday, with only National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir opposing the decision. The council was established under the initiative of former US President Donald Trump and aims to manage Gaza's affairs.
This decision comes amid reports that the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) have constructed a large dirt barrier separating the Israeli-controlled area of Gaza from the Hamas-controlled western part. According to satellite images published by AP, over 23 kilometers of the barrier have been built in recent months, covering more than half of Gaza's length. The IDF confirmed to AP that the physical barrier is located along the "yellow line," the border to which Israeli forces withdrew as part of the ceasefire agreement signed last October, which included the release of all hostages. This "yellow line" was established as a temporary division of territory under a US-supported agreement pending a fuller Israeli withdrawal.
Last month, The Guardian reported that the Peace Council plans to grant itself broad legal immunity and acquire public lands in Gaza without payment. A draft decision document obtained by The Guardian, described as "sensitive but unclassified," outlines extensive protections for Peace Council members, its administrative branch, the Office of the High Representative (OHR), Palestinian technocrats, international military forces, and foreign contractors operating in Gaza. This move has drawn criticism from the United Nations.
The approval of the Peace Council's entry into Gaza marks a significant development in the region's governance and security arrangements, reflecting ongoing international involvement and complex local dynamics. The council's role and legal status in Gaza remain subjects of scrutiny and debate.
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.
