Historian Warns Democrats Could Turn US Against Israel
Translated & summarized from Cursorinfo by baba
Historian Victor Davis Hanson believes a future Democratic U.S. administration could shift policy and potentially make Israel an adversary. He cited concerns about antisemitism within the party and suggested potential policy changes like resuming Hamas funding. Hanson also urged former President Trump to strike Iran's nuclear facilities. He noted that Trump's legacy may hinge on the U.S. economy and Iran's denuclearization. Separately, a Democratic Senator-elect supported halting military aid to Israel.
The story in 5 lines · by baba
- Historian Victor Davis Hanson warns Democrats could make Israel an enemy of the U.S.
- Hanson suggests a Democratic administration might resume funding to Hamas.
- He urged former President Trump to strike Iran's nuclear infrastructure.
- Hanson believes Trump's legacy depends on the U.S. economy and Iran's denuclearization.
- Democrat Senator-elect Abdul El-Sayed supports halting military aid to Israel.
American conservative historian Victor Davis Hanson has warned that a potential future Democratic administration in the United States could fundamentally alter U.S. policy towards Israel, potentially positioning the Jewish state as an adversary. Hanson expressed concern in an interview with The Daily Signal that growing sentiments within the Democratic Party, which he described as increasingly susceptible to antisemitism, could lead to significant shifts in Middle Eastern policy. He suggested that such an administration might resume funding to Hamas, remove the Houthi rebels from terror watchlists, and adopt a more favorable stance towards groups hostile to Israel. "I can imagine a moment when Israel becomes an enemy of the United States, at least in the eyes of an administration," Hanson stated.
Beyond the U.S.-Israel relationship, Hanson also addressed policy towards Iran, criticizing the perceived indecisiveness of the current U.S. administration between diplomacy and military action. He urged former President Donald Trump to abandon negotiations with Tehran and instead launch a strike against Iran's nuclear infrastructure, specifically mentioning an underground facility at Mount Pikax south of Natanz. Hanson proposed a direct military operation using stealth bombers, followed by intensified sanctions, support for internal opposition groups, and ensuring freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. He believes the U.S. should then withdraw, allowing international isolation and internal pressure to weaken the Iranian regime.
Hanson also criticized past U.S. presidents for their reluctance to confront Iran decisively, suggesting seven previous leaders avoided taking responsibility despite understanding the threat. He noted that Trump should have better prepared the American public for the potential consequences and costs of confronting Iran.
In a separate piece for The Free Press, Hanson assessed Trump's post-election political standing, suggesting that despite Republican setbacks in the midterms and a stronger Democratic presence in Congress, Trump retains some foreign policy flexibility. However, he indicated that Trump's legacy and future political standing will largely depend on the state of the U.S. economy and the success of achieving Iran's denuclearization.
Separately, the article mentions that newly elected U.S. Senator Abdul El-Sayed, a Democrat, has supported Trump's decision to cease military aid to Israel.
Mentioned
The same event, reported separately by each outlet. Open a few to compare what different newsrooms emphasize — and what they leave out.
Centre 1Other 1
Not the same event — other stories that share this one’s people, places, or theme: background, reactions, and follow-ups.