Get Plus

Sign in to baba News

One account across the web, iPhone and Android — your subscription follows it.

or use an email code

Search stories

Type at least two characters. Results come from every newsroom baba reads.

↑↓ to move · ↵ to open · esc to close

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to keep asking. News Plus removes the daily limit.

or use an email code

Ongoing Story· Day 49

Israel's Knesset Legal Advisor to Tell High Court Repeat Vote Needed for State Comptroller

2 developments

MakoPolitics

Israeli Supreme Court Criticizes Knesset Speaker Ohana for Delaying State Comptroller Vote

Translated & summarized from Mako by baba

CenterCharged tone

Hebrew · 6 newsrooms covering

Israel's Supreme Court criticized Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana for delaying a vote for State Comptroller, ruling his actions violated a previous court order and harmed governmental order. Although the court dismissed a petition to set a date due to the election of a new Knesset, it fined Ohana 10,000 shekels for legal costs.

The story in 4 lines · by baba

  • Supreme Court criticized Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana for delaying State Comptroller vote.
  • Court ruled Ohana's delay violated a previous order and harmed governmental order.
  • A petition to set a date for the vote was dismissed due to new Knesset elections.
  • Ohana was ordered to pay 10,000 shekels in legal costs.

Israel's Supreme Court on Tuesday dismissed a petition seeking to set a date for a vote to elect a State Comptroller, but issued a strong rebuke to Knesset Speaker Amir Ohana. The court ruled that Ohana's decision to postpone the vote until after the upcoming elections constituted a "severe blow to the order of government and the regime," violating a previous court order.

The petition was based on a July 2, 2026, ruling that had ordered a new vote for the State Comptroller after the initial round was invalidated. Justices Yitzhak Amit, Khaled Kabub, and Ruth Ronen found that Ohana had failed to schedule this repeat vote, contrary to the Knesset's legal advisor's position and the court's prior judgment.

Despite the criticism, the court dismissed the petition due to changed political circumstances. The election of the 26th Knesset the previous Tuesday created difficulties in implementing the original ruling, which pertained to candidates in the 25th Knesset. The Knesset's legal advisor had acknowledged the principle of the petitioner's stance but highlighted potential implementation challenges.

As a consequence of Ohana's actions, the Supreme Court ordered him to pay 10,000 shekels in legal costs.

MakoCentre · Neve Ilan

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Sign in to baba News

Sign in to follow newsrooms, topics and people.

or use an email code

Mentioned

Open the Wire